PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Build Your Own

 
 
james.igoe@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Apr 2009

No so much a question, but looking for feedback on building ne's own
logging features:

Being new to DotNET, I wanted to build a website properly from the
ground up, so one of the first things I created was a system logger
class and a related table. The class can be included in an code
behind module, and then various methods can be invoked, depending on
the logging values required. I have methods for generic logging, used
for page hits, in which I collect browser, page name and IP info, as
well as error logging methods, which allow me to collect error values
and stack trace information.

I've seen the packages, and wondering what I lose out on by not using
them.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jesse Houwing
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Apr 2009
Hello james,

> No so much a question, but looking for feedback on building ne's own
> logging features:
>
> Being new to DotNET, I wanted to build a website properly from the
> ground up, so one of the first things I created was a system logger
> class and a related table. The class can be included in an code
> behind module, and then various methods can be invoked, depending on
> the logging values required. I have methods for generic logging, used
> for page hits, in which I collect browser, page name and IP info, as
> well as error logging methods, which allow me to collect error values
> and stack trace information.
>
> I've seen the packages, and wondering what I lose out on by not using
> them.


A lot of your own time... ofcourse you can roll your own, but if there is
one that suits your needs, then don't invent the same wheel all over again...
--
Jesse Houwing
jesse.houwing at sogeti.nl


 
Reply With Quote
 
Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Apr 2009
You lose time, as you are re-inventing the wheel, so to speak.

There is nothing wrong with building yourself. And, depending on how well
you like the libraries you can purchase/download, it might be a better
option. So, I am not going to say yes or no on this one.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*********************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*********************************************
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f74a7d1e-ee90-4224-b023-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> No so much a question, but looking for feedback on building ne's own
> logging features:
>
> Being new to DotNET, I wanted to build a website properly from the
> ground up, so one of the first things I created was a system logger
> class and a related table. The class can be included in an code
> behind module, and then various methods can be invoked, depending on
> the logging values required. I have methods for generic logging, used
> for page hits, in which I collect browser, page name and IP info, as
> well as error logging methods, which allow me to collect error values
> and stack trace information.
>
> I've seen the packages, and wondering what I lose out on by not using
> them.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Next Build Shall be RTM guys not any other builds unless MS decides to do one more build because of bugs before RTM RC2 build 5477 is the last build before RTM Drew Windows Vista General Discussion 8 13th Oct 2006 12:41 AM
I meant RC2 Build 5744 is the last build unless ms find more bugs before the RTM build and gold version there only make another build if there more bugs and not ready for RTM Drew Windows Vista General Discussion 4 12th Oct 2006 02:17 PM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI vvcd Storage Devices 2 4th Dec 2005 11:46 AM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI code_fu Anti-Virus 2 2nd Oct 2004 09:32 AM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI code_fu Windows XP Basics 0 2nd Oct 2004 05:11 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.