http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: (E-Mail Removed)vethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>
OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!


--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website: http://bearbottoms1.com

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>
Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say 1300
sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe likes it a
lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has liked dos based
ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough job handling the
sigs you list, then it surely should get a better rating from them.

Bottoms line is I'm getting it and putting it in my recovery toolbox.


--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website: http://bearbottoms1.com

"Bear Bottoms" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in newsp.tugcy8snjo4m88
@c57jw11:

> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>>
> OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!

Great.

I look forward to your findings.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: (E-Mail Removed)vethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

"Bear Bottoms" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:

> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>>
> Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
> recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
> 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe

Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.

> likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
> liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
> job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
> rating from them.

It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working
on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
down malware.



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: (E-Mail Removed)vethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

Bear Bottoms - 25.06.2007 02:58 :

> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>>
> OK, I'm looking at bughunter now!
>
>

me too!

--

by(e) PS

spam will be killfiled

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Bear Bottoms" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> newsp.tugdgeuqjo4m88@c57jw11:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:41:09 -0500, Dustin Cook
> > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >
> >> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
> >>
> > Well, waddaya know. I like it. Seems to be a good tool to have in your
> > recovery toolbox. Some of the reviews are outdated, like some say
> > 1300 sigs, and you now have over 9000. Is this correct? Downloadpipe
>

Doesn't Beararse sound a lot like
AV shill Chuckie the mental radioham?


> Some of the reviews are outdated yes. While it's true BugHunter can't
> prevent you from getting the annoying stuff it scans for, it does a
> reasonably decent job of cleaning it up, if I do say so myself. heh.
>

Yes, more shitaz spamming for your
Trojan crap tool, you don't mention it
nearly enough in these groups!

*MORE!*


> > likes it a lot giving it their 5 star rating. Snapfiles never has
> > liked dos based ware from what I've seen. If it truly does a thorough
> > job handling the sigs you list, then it surely should get a better
> > rating from them.
>

That's right Chuckie II shill that
beauty!


> It's GUI isn't what they consider to be user friendly. I've been working

WHAT?! Never! That's GUI is a masterpiece

> on a new layout, but it's not ready to send to beta testers to see if
>

*Hmmm* me thinks Raidy dickhead has taken
my critque too heart :-(


>they even think it's worth doing or not. BugHunter wasn't designed for
> eye candy in mind so much as it was for doing what it does best, hunt
> down malware.
>

Eye candy *ROFL* I can't wait to see the
next spastic cobbled together "GUI"
front-end you are going to tag onto your
bASIC batch script.


4Q
http://fourq.host.sk <-- Chuckie, here's
the 5star review you were looking for.