PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Bug Q305227 in XP?

 
 
Adrian Ugray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Mar 2004
Apologies if my posting to this group is not considered appropriate, but....

Does anyone know if the Heap corruption issues that were found in Win2000
(SP2 or less), and fixed in SP 3 of Win2000, have also been rolled into any
of the versions of XP? (See Q305227)

We have some software that is showing symptoms similar to those we
experienced prior to upgrading to SP3 of W2K, that now seem to be showing up
on a vanilla version of XP Pro.

I wonder if there are any techos out there that can confirm that the issue
is definitely resolved in XP (or one of the service pack updates).

[Obviously, we dont discount that the problem lies within our own software,
rather than laying blame with the OS, but any feedback may be helpful]

Thanks,
Adrian.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
John Phillips
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Mar 2004
Looks like it -=should=- be fixed in XP. If you use the DLL Help Database
(http://support.microsoft.com/default...fileversion/dl
linfo.asp), you'll see that Windows 2000 SP3 uses version 5.0.2195.5400 of
NTDLL.dll, and XP uses 5.1.2600.0. So, in theory...


--
John Phillips
MVP - Windows SDK



"Adrian Ugray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%232GgGz$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Apologies if my posting to this group is not considered appropriate,

but....
>
> Does anyone know if the Heap corruption issues that were found in Win2000
> (SP2 or less), and fixed in SP 3 of Win2000, have also been rolled into

any
> of the versions of XP? (See Q305227)
>
> We have some software that is showing symptoms similar to those we
> experienced prior to upgrading to SP3 of W2K, that now seem to be showing

up
> on a vanilla version of XP Pro.
>
> I wonder if there are any techos out there that can confirm that the issue
> is definitely resolved in XP (or one of the service pack updates).
>
> [Obviously, we dont discount that the problem lies within our own

software,
> rather than laying blame with the OS, but any feedback may be helpful]
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian.
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Adrian Ugray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Mar 2004
Thanks John,

Yes, it would seem it should be fixed. However, further digging (using
Dll Help - thanks for that one!) reveals the following for ntdll.dll

2000 SP3 (5.0.2195.5400) has a mod date of 7/22/2002
XP Vanillla (5.1.2600.0) has a mod date of 8/23/2001

So presumably, it is very possible that the bug still existed in 1st
XP Release.

XP SP1 (5.1.2600.1106) has a mod date of 8/29/2002, which is after the
2000SP3 release, so maybe it was rolled into SP1, however release
notes do not appear to mention it.

Of course, maybe XP's ntdll version is very different to previous
versions, however I doubt it, as MS only had a minor version number
upgrade....I cant seem to find any more info on this bug other than
that it was fixed in 2000 SP3 and an issue with OSs before it...

Appreciate the comments.
Adrian.

"John Phillips" wrote
> Looks like it -=should=- be fixed in XP. If you use the DLL Help

Database
>

(http://support.microsoft.com/default...fileversion/dl
> linfo.asp), you'll see that Windows 2000 SP3 uses version 5.0.2195.5400 of
> NTDLL.dll, and XP uses 5.1.2600.0. So, in theory...


> "Adrian Ugray" wrote
> > Does anyone know if the Heap corruption issues that were found in

Win2000
> > (SP2 or less), and fixed in SP 3 of Win2000, have also been rolled into

> any
> > of the versions of XP? (See Q305227)
> >
> > We have some software that is showing symptoms similar to those we
> > experienced prior to upgrading to SP3 of W2K, that now seem to be

showing
> up
> > on a vanilla version of XP Pro.
> >
> > I wonder if there are any techos out there that can confirm that the

issue
> > is definitely resolved in XP (or one of the service pack updates).
> >
> > [Obviously, we dont discount that the problem lies within our own

> software,
> > rather than laying blame with the OS, but any feedback may be helpful]
> >



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM.