Anyone else notice there are exactly 65535 (one more than this magic
65536 number) of rows allowed in older versions of excel? In older
versions of the program, this equation works properly so I believe it
has something to do with the row indexing logic. Sounds like a cut &
paste job from the older version but they forgot to change the limits
since 2007 allows far more rows/columns than previous versions.

And *that* sounds like complete balderdash...

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> Sounds like a cut & paste job from the older version but they forgot
> to change the limits since 2007 allows far more rows/columns than
> previous versions.

Huh!?!?!?!

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> Anyone else notice there are exactly 65535 (one more than this magic
> 65536 number) of rows allowed in older versions of excel? In older
> versions of the program, this equation works properly so I believe it
> has something to do with the row indexing logic. Sounds like a cut &
> paste job from the older version but they forgot to change the limits
> since 2007 allows far more rows/columns than previous versions.
>