I still disagree. As long as the change has not been accepted, then both
deleted and inserted text are displayed in the document. If you choose to
apply no formatting to the deleted text, then you can't tell it's been
deleted. I agree that "None" is an odd and unlikely formatting choice, but I
do believe that it is behaving exactly as advertised. If deleted text
formatted with strikethrough or any other formatting remains in the
document, then deleted text formatted with "None" should do the same, just
as inserted text formatted with "None" gives no indication that it has been
inserted.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
"djprius" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:elHGmF%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi, Bob,
>
>> What version of Word are you finding this in?
>
> Word 2007
>
>> I am see the behavior in Word 2007. If you turn off the the options
>> to mark deletions and balloon then try to delete text with track
>> changes on you get a change bar in the margin but the text you try to
>> delete still shows in Original showing markup view but not in in
>> Final or Final showing markup views.
>
> In mine, the delete still shows in Final Showing Markup (if "inline" is
> used, not balloons), as well as Original Showing Markup.
>
>
>> May not be considered a bug, but could be considered an odd design
>> choice.
>
> I don't see it quite that way. I'd analyze it this way: The option of
> "none" is in the "Markup" section of the dialog box. To me that means
> "how does one want the change -- addition or deletion -- shown to reader".
> For example, one can show the deletion with a strikethough or show it as a
> "^" mark, etc. So, to show the deletion as "none" means to me, in effect,
> don't give any visual representation of the change made -- in other words,
> make the deletion, but do *not* show that the deletion was made. Such
> would be done by removing the text in Final Showing Markup. (As Suzanne
> has correctly noted, this turns out to be the same result as if one used
> the "hidden" option; I'd have no objection if MS removed the "none"
> option, but right now I think it does not work as one would expect.)
>
> This issue is minor, but it would be nice if it were righted.
>
> <snip>
>
> David
|