I just recently converted from shared boarders to frames. Last night all of
my hyperlinks (my other web pages) were viewed from the frame. This morning
when I click on my hyperlinks the pages come up without the frame.
Not sure what happen or what I did to cause this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

Why convert to frames? Shared borders, while not perfect, are a much
better option than frames.

What you see is what anyone will see if they go to one of your pages
from a search engine. Frames also make it difficult (if not impossible)
to bookmark pages.

Please give a link to the site, then we will be able to tell you what
went wrong.

--
Ron Symonds - Microsoft MVP (FrontPage)
Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.

http://www.rxs-enterprises.org/fp




"Allen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2EF09491-025D-473A-ABD5-(E-Mail Removed):

> I just recently converted from shared boarders to frames. Last night all of
> my hyperlinks (my other web pages) were viewed from the frame. This morning
> when I click on my hyperlinks the pages come up without the frame.
> Not sure what happen or what I did to cause this issue.
> Any help would be appreciated.

I think that's taking 3 steps backwards......Shared Borders are "better"
than frames. But Dynamic Web Templates (introduced in FP2003 and continued
in Expression Web) are better still.

Remember you have to browse to the "frameset" file not the individual pages
that make up the framed page.

Can you give an example of the page with the problem (post the URL in a
reply to this thread).

"Allen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2EF09491-025D-473A-ABD5-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I just recently converted from shared boarders to frames. Last night all of
> my hyperlinks (my other web pages) were viewed from the frame. This
> morning
> when I click on my hyperlinks the pages come up without the frame.
> Not sure what happen or what I did to cause this issue.
> Any help would be appreciated.