"Alexander Grigoriev" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:una9b.3700$(E-Mail Removed)...
> One more clarification:
Bwah, you shouldn't have done that!
> as long as an OS doesn't grab USB controller from legacy-emulation BIOS, it
> will work. MSDOS is likely to boot, and possibly Windows 95, but nothing more.
I thought I understood your previous explanation, now I
haven't got a clue what you were actually talking about.
Are you hinting at MS-DOS compatibility mode?
>
> "Alexander Grigoriev" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:vka9b.3680$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > It was told in MS newsgroups by MS folks, boot device driver requires
> > special code to support switch from BIOS to the driver and to support paging
> > file/hiberfile operations, but neither USB nor IEEE1394 drivers contain it.
> > External SATA drive may work, though.
> >
> > "J.Clarke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:51:36 +0000 (UTC) "Andre" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible to install windows xp onto an external HD then boot off
> > > > it? It you cant directly, then how about booting from a floppy which
> > > > can then tell the system to goto external hd and load windows???
> > > >
> > > > Please tell as i dont wanna waste my money buying the drive and find
> > > > out i cant cheers!
> > >
> > > If your system does not have a BIOS option to boot from a USB or
> > > Firewire drive then you won't be able to boot XP off of one. If the
> > > drive is supported in the BIOS and can be accessed from DOS without
> > > a driver then it _might_ be possible to make a boot diskette that
> > > transfers control to the external disk but I've not heard of that ever
> > > being done with XP.
> > >
> > > In other words whether this can be done depends on the particular
> > > capabilities of the machine that you are using, but in general you're
> > > not going to find the capability to boot from USB or Firewire on any but
> > > the newest hardware and you're going to find it on precious little of that.
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > --John
> > > Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
> > > (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> >
> >
>
>
|