Aragorn wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 00:44, DandyDon stood up and addressed the
> masses in /alt.os.linux.mandrake/ as follows...:
>
>> Linux uses a bootloader program called Grub.
>
> Not necessarily. There are two main bootloaders used by GNU/Linux
> distributions, i.e. LILO and GRUB.
>
> LILO (LInux LOader) is the oldest one of the two, while GRUB (GRand
> Unified
> Bootloader) is newer. Unlike LILO, GRUB is a miniature OS with a shell,
> capable of reading filesystems directly - LILO uses binary C/H/S or LBA
> addresses.
>
>> Google for it. Maybe you can just reinstall it and get into Windows.
>
> Setting up LILO or GRUB in the OP's circumstances would require the OP to
> use the commandline from a bootable install or rescue CD. Considering the
> OP's level of knowledge of both Windows and GNU/Linux, this is a virtually
> impossible task for him.
>
> An automated repair of the bootloader would be impossible since he's
> already erased his GNU/Linux set-up, and so the installer/rescue disk
> won't be able to retrieve anything anymore to base the correct repair
> procedure on.
>
> Either way, the OP does not need to install LILO or GRUB. All he needs to
> do is to make sure that the MBR of his hard disk is overwritten again with
> a Windows-specific one - which would _get_ _rid_ of LILO/GRUB - and that
> his Windows boot partition is bootable/active again.
>
>> Also try Linux.org message boards for help.
>
> With all due respect, I find it very ironic and striking that you -
> obviously a Windows user and most likely a resident
> of /microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/ - should be giving *that* advice
> when the OP's problem is clearly one of not being able to boot Windows,
> presumable because he used some brute force tool to remove GNU/Linux from
> his hard disk, and all this while a Windows install CD has the necessary
> tools to allow him to repair his Windows-specific bootloader!
>
> It is this lack of understanding of how a computer works and even how
> Windows works that gives GNU/Linux an unwarranted bad reputation. The OP
> had both Windows and GNU/Linux on his hard disk and he chose to remove
> GNU/Linux from within Windows. Now that GNU/Linux is gone, the method the
> OP used for getting rid of GNU/Linux also made Windows unbootable.
>
> This has nothing to do with GNU/Linux, and GNU/Linux is not even installed
> on his system anymore, so it couldn't even do any damage if it wanted to -
> and it doesn't want to; it plays perfectly well with any other operating
> system.
>
> But then to the GNU/Linux-unsavvy - let's call it that - GNU/Linux is the
> cause of the OP's problems and he should turn to GNU/Linux to undo his
> damage. Pure FUD!
>
Aragorn,
These Windows users never fail to amaze me with how much lack of
understanding they have of computers. I guess that comes with the sheltered
lifestyles they "enjoy" when running MS-Windows, where little real
knowledge is required as MS has already determined how they clickety-click
their way around that toy operating system. It's only when they start
screwing around with things they don't know, like the OP has done, that it
becomes all too obvious. :-) I agree totally that when confronted with the
need to understand how their computers actually work, they tend to lash out
at GNU/Linux blaming it for their problems. If the OP really wanted to get
that computer to boot and to really use a powerful and secure operating
system, he'd wipe the whole damn thing clean and just install GNU/Linux.
Cheers.
--
Linux is ready for the desktop! More ready than Windoze XP.
http://tinyurl.com/ldm9d
"Computer users around the globe recognize that the most serious threats to
security exist because of inherent weaknesses in the Microsoft operating
system." McAfee