PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Blocking lewd email content

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?TEg=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Oct 2007
My mail box is being bombarded by lewd email ads. Blocking the sender or
adding it to the Junk Mail does nothing because the sender of the email is
continually changing. Is there a way for me to block emails based on content
or key words?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Y29ja3k=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Oct 2007
yes there is , go to tools and then to mail rules, there you see list and you
can fill in key words.



"LH" wrote:

> My mail box is being bombarded by lewd email ads. Blocking the sender or
> adding it to the Junk Mail does nothing because the sender of the email is
> continually changing. Is there a way for me to block emails based on content
> or key words?

 
Reply With Quote
 
VanguardLH
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Oct 2007
"LH" wrote in message
news:F8A35BFE-E337-41BA-84F4-(E-Mail Removed)...
> My mail box is being bombarded by lewd email ads. Blocking the
> sender or
> adding it to the Junk Mail does nothing because the sender of the
> email is
> continually changing. Is there a way for me to block emails based
> on content
> or key words?



Not if they sender is using HTML. In plain text, they might say
"mortgage" but in HTML it could be "mort<b></b>gage". When rendered,
and nothing is getting affected by the null string between the start
and end tags for bolding, you only see "mortgage". They could also
show the word altogher but parts of it are in different cells in a
table. There are other methods in HTML to slice up a word within the
body but which you see as one word. So searching on "mortgage" in a
rule won't work in HTML-formatted e-mails. You could define a rule
but only expect it to work on plain-text mails.

Get a real anti-spam solution. You didn't bother to mention WHICH
version of Outlook that you use. Bayesian filtering (in OL2003+) is
insufficient for determining what is spam or ham, especially if you
don't update the Bayes database (and instead rely on what Microsoft
stuffed in their update). SpamPal is free. There are lots of
anti-spam solutions, some free, some not.

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?RGF2ZQ==?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Oct 2007
The latest dodge that appeared today is that the senders are using
"charset=iso-8859-1" meta language. I would really appreciate knowing how to
block that.


"VanguardLH" wrote:

> "LH" wrote in message
> news:F8A35BFE-E337-41BA-84F4-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > My mail box is being bombarded by lewd email ads. Blocking the
> > sender or
> > adding it to the Junk Mail does nothing because the sender of the
> > email is
> > continually changing. Is there a way for me to block emails based
> > on content
> > or key words?

>
>
> Not if they sender is using HTML. In plain text, they might say
> "mortgage" but in HTML it could be "mort<b></b>gage". When rendered,
> and nothing is getting affected by the null string between the start
> and end tags for bolding, you only see "mortgage". They could also
> show the word altogher but parts of it are in different cells in a
> table. There are other methods in HTML to slice up a word within the
> body but which you see as one word. So searching on "mortgage" in a
> rule won't work in HTML-formatted e-mails. You could define a rule
> but only expect it to work on plain-text mails.
>
> Get a real anti-spam solution. You didn't bother to mention WHICH
> version of Outlook that you use. Bayesian filtering (in OL2003+) is
> insufficient for determining what is spam or ham, especially if you
> don't update the Bayes database (and instead rely on what Microsoft
> stuffed in their update). SpamPal is free. There are lots of
> anti-spam solutions, some free, some not.
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian Tillman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Nov 2007
Dave <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> The latest dodge that appeared today is that the senders are using
> "charset=iso-8859-1" meta language. I would really appreciate
> knowing how to block that.


You probably don't want to do that. ISO-8859 is the character set that
contains the Western Europe (Latin1) alphabet (i.e., standard English).
Latin1 is HTML's base character set (without Internationalization).
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?RGF2ZQ==?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Nov 2007
I believe you are right. An interesting development though, 95 messages
today (a day later) all were in 'clear', not in the ISO charset, and were
trapped by my regular filters.

"Brian Tillman" wrote:

> Dave <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > The latest dodge that appeared today is that the senders are using
> > "charset=iso-8859-1" meta language. I would really appreciate
> > knowing how to block that.

>
> You probably don't want to do that. ISO-8859 is the character set that
> contains the Western Europe (Latin1) alphabet (i.e., standard English).
> Latin1 is HTML's base character set (without Internationalization).
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blocking unwanted content from this newsgroup Mark Northup Microsoft ASP .NET 0 6th Oct 2010 02:40 PM
Lewd Messages jonyo Windows XP Basics 5 1st Jan 2007 06:29 PM
Content blocking? Steven Platt Windows XP Security 2 20th Jul 2006 05:46 PM
Content Advisor is not Blocking Sites =?Utf-8?B?RGFyd2Fs?= Windows XP Help 1 9th Nov 2004 05:47 PM
Blocking unwanted content Teressa Windows XP Security 1 9th Jan 2004 01:40 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.