2. However I like Jeff's idea of making it a Date field as that would answer
two question: If they are inactive and when did that happen.
1. That's almost always a bad idea including moving the records to another
database.
If you change the table structure of the 'active' table, but forget to do
the 'inactive' table, the records might not move correctly.
Speaking of moving, it becomes a 2 step process of appending to the inactive
table then deleting from the active. If someone becomes active again, you
have to do things in reverse.
If you need membership info from both tables, you'll need a Union query
which are somewhat cumbersome and slow.
--
Jerry Whittle, Microsoft Access MVP
Light. Strong. Cheap. Pick two. Keith Bontrager - Bicycle Builder.
"Kathy R." wrote:
> I am creating a membership database for a church. Individual
> information is in three basic tables:
>
> tblFamily
> FamLastName (for entire family)
> Address
>
> tblIndividual
> FirstName
> MiddleName
> LastName (takes care of hyphenated married names, or different names for
> children, etc.)
> BirthDate
> MarriageDate
>
> tblMembership
> JoinDate
> JoinManner
> TerminationDate
> TerminationManner
> and more...
>
> Once a person leaves the membership of the church I need to "archive"
> the information. It needs to be kept for our permanent records. What
> is the best way to do this? My two thoughts would be:
>
> 1) set up duplicate tables and move the "archive" information to it
>
> or
>
> 2) Create an active/not active field in the tblIndividual and keep all
> the information, both active and archived in the original set of tables.
>
> Is one way or the other better or more efficient? Is there some other
> way that I haven't thought of that would work better?
>
> Thank you for your help and input!
>
> Kathy R.
> .
>
|