PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Best strategy for testing an application across Win2K, XP, Win2K Server, and 2003 Server

 
 
Mike Niemann
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Sep 2005
First, if this is not the appropriate forum please point me to the proper
one.

We have a Clinical application (client/server architecture, although quite a
few single computer installations) that we need to validate across our
targeted supported operating systems. I have searched the MSDN knowledgebase
for information (hopefully a matrix of differences between the different
operating systems)... unfortuanately I haven't found anything useful to
date.

Our belief is that these operating systems are essentially equivalent [at
least as far as the kernel/sdk functionality we use], but we are having one
heck of a time "proving" it.

We would obviously prefer not to have to "brute force" the validation using
all the combinations and permutations of these operating systems (service
packs, languages - 16 so far, mainly Latin code page).

Does anyone have guidance on how they have approached this kind of issue?

Regards, Mike Niemann


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ghostrider
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Sep 2005

Mike Niemann wrote:

> First, if this is not the appropriate forum please point me to the proper
> one.
>
> We have a Clinical application (client/server architecture, although quite a
> few single computer installations) that we need to validate across our
> targeted supported operating systems. I have searched the MSDN knowledgebase
> for information (hopefully a matrix of differences between the different
> operating systems)... unfortuanately I haven't found anything useful to
> date.
>
> Our belief is that these operating systems are essentially equivalent [at
> least as far as the kernel/sdk functionality we use], but we are having one
> heck of a time "proving" it.
>
> We would obviously prefer not to have to "brute force" the validation using
> all the combinations and permutations of these operating systems (service
> packs, languages - 16 so far, mainly Latin code page).
>
> Does anyone have guidance on how they have approached this kind of issue?
>
> Regards, Mike Niemann



What type of clinical application? Medical device? Information
Systems? Medical Records? Patient billing? That is, the scope of
the validation may already be restricted to a limited number of
platforms or OS's.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Niemann
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      14th Sep 2005

"Ghostrider" <-00-@fitron.142> wrote in message
news:uY$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> Mike Niemann wrote:
>
> > First, if this is not the appropriate forum please point me to the

proper
> > one.
> >
> > We have a Clinical application (client/server architecture, although

quite a
> > few single computer installations) that we need to validate across our
> > targeted supported operating systems. I have searched the MSDN

knowledgebase
> > for information (hopefully a matrix of differences between the different
> > operating systems)... unfortuanately I haven't found anything useful to
> > date.
> >
> > Our belief is that these operating systems are essentially equivalent

[at
> > least as far as the kernel/sdk functionality we use], but we are having

one
> > heck of a time "proving" it.
> >
> > We would obviously prefer not to have to "brute force" the validation

using
> > all the combinations and permutations of these operating systems

(service
> > packs, languages - 16 so far, mainly Latin code page).
> >
> > Does anyone have guidance on how they have approached this kind of

issue?
> >
> > Regards, Mike Niemann

>
>
> What type of clinical application? Medical device? Information
> Systems? Medical Records? Patient billing? That is, the scope of
> the validation may already be restricted to a limited number of
> platforms or OS's.


Yes this application is an accessory to a Medical device, and has medical
records and billing support.

What I am hoping to do is find a comprehensive "differences" matrix for the
OS's we support, so that mitigations can be developed, or specific testing
testing done to confirm the application operates as expected in each
environment. At the superficial level, all these OS's should be functionally
equivalent (since they are based on NT), but there are differences...
However, we have been unable to find such an official "differences list" on
the Microsoft web site(s).

Regards, Mike Niemann


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Win2K Server > Win2K Server account migration? msnews Microsoft Windows 2000 0 9th Aug 2005 10:59 PM
Dual boot Win2k Professional and Win2k Server/Advanced Server =?Utf-8?B?SmFzb24gS3JldHplcg==?= Microsoft Windows 2000 1 3rd Dec 2004 09:15 PM
Using Win2K server or Win 2003 server as a router - doesn't work. Mark Microsoft Windows 2000 0 27th Aug 2004 02:44 AM
Re: Upgrading Win2K Advanced Server to Windows 2003 Standard Server Scott Harding - MS MVP Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server 4 17th May 2004 10:21 PM
QUESTION: Win2K vs Win 2003 Server (for server machine) VB Programmer Microsoft Windows 2000 1 6th Jan 2004 08:47 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM.