[Kenny]

Not the most up-to-date thing any more, but what socket A motherboard can be pushed furthest? Have an AMD 2500+ that I can get to just under 2178MHz with an Asus A7V8X-X mobo. Any higher than 198x11 and it gets unstable. I`m convinced the mobo is holding me back, so what do y`all recommend? The A7V8X-X has a KT400 Northbridge, would a KT800 or Nforce2 do better? Better cooling on the Northbridge? Lower the multiplier? (currently locked)

Cheers

Kenny


P.S. keeping with Socket A coz i dont think the fiscal outlay to buy a `939 board and proc is worth it for the performance increase. Although I wouldnt say no to an Nforce4 with 2x6800GT`s....

[christopherpostill]

What about an nForce 2 board...??

[floppybootstomp]

DFI LanParty nFII Ultra B Link (2nd one down)

Has lots of overclocking features, including several Bios configurations you can save and switch between. Can also reset CMOS from Bios, without using jumper.

This board was made for Gamers and Overclockers, the main designer used to work for Abit.

[christopherpostill]

Oh good they gave it Firewire

The old one didn't have it.

Actually...typing as i think... it may have been the canterwood they didnt give 1394 to

Good board.

[floppybootstomp]

I've actually just bought one of those DFI boards, I couldn't resist it Which is why I have one of my Gigabyte boards up for sale. The Gigabyte's a fine board, but no good for overclocking. I suddenly got the flavour to tweak again but I haven't messed around with any settings yet, it's only been in there since Friday.

The DFI must have been the easiest motherboard installation I've ever done, went like a dream, I'm using the 2 x 35Gb Raptors in a RAID 0 with it. It also has lots of little things that make sense, I noticed quite a few whilst installing it, like for instance all the connections are in sensible places and it has two onboard push buttons for reset and power-on for, so it's easy to use outside the case.

I'm really pleased with it, got me's one of them UV strip lights as well to show it off

This will definitely be my last Socket A board. Next step, probably around Spring/April time, will be a Socket 939 board.

[christopherpostill]

If i don't go to america next year to learn to fly (i hope i do) then a new PC will be on my shopping list.

Providing i have a car and insurance by then.

So thats 4 grand i need... grand for a Defender 90 or a 306 or a clio or something and then 3 for insurance...

My next PC will probably be Intel.

I say this because i have had beter experiences with Intel - one of them being overclocking. Squeezing every last MHz from it... I also generally just like them more, i despise Socket A installation. Will try a 64bit chip in my next customers computer.

[floppybootstomp]

Time was, my man, when Socket A absolutely ruled over Intel. Intel went through so many incarnations trying to get it right whilst AMD just plodded along making their Socket A chips better and better.

Just a few short years ago, AMD went hand in hand with the expression 'Overclocking' Intel just pandered to Mesh, Gateway, ignorant home users and blue chip companies.

Intel's marketing has been despicable. They have falsified figures and out and out lied to sell their product.

But it does seem as though they've finally got their act together and yes, I'll agree, the current batch of Intel CPU's probably overclock better than AMD chips.

But you ever wondered why? If it wasn't for AMD, Intel would still be making boring, bog-standard chips and charging you a small fortune for it.

You despise Socket A chips? Ironic, then, that if it wasn't for socket A, you wouldn't be overclcocking that Intel chip quite so much.

Intel looked at AMD, smelled the coffee, and addressed the problem - to a degree.

But they still ain't got no 64 bit have they? And they're still overpriced.

I don't like Intel cos I've seen their smug, arrogant attitude, and then I've seen them humbled by AMD, and then I've seen them back pedal and actually supply what the enthusiast wants - again, to a degree.

You should be grateful to AMD mister, not despise them cos the installation is a teensier bit trickier

[christopherpostill]

Did i say i despised socket A? No

Did i say i despised socket A installation? Yes.

I use Socket A processors in a good 80% of computers i build for people because they are cheaper, fast and they work well.

When building a computer i don't go by things the company done, i look at the performance of the chip i'm thinking about buying. I couldn't give a monkeys about the company and what they are doing - if a chip is good and fairly priced, or overclocks better than the AMD equivalent, i'll buy it.

Im not saying by any means that Socket A is bad - for the price of a celeron you can get a 2500+ which quite frankly urinates all over it - a good buy? yes. Do i like it? yes. better than intel? yes.

I am grateful of AMD, all i was saying is that their heatsinks are fiddly and that Intel overclock better at the mo.

But no, i havent tried LGA775 or 64bit so i shall reserve any judgement on either of those.

Oww fingers are aching

Chris

[floppybootstomp]

Chris, I hear you.

It occured to me after my last post that you said installation of Socket A CPU's, not the chips themselves.

In fact, I done a hasty re-edit of the last line of my post to reflect that.

So, I was wrong, sorry bout dat.

On the other hand, I got that little lot off me chest, didn't I?

[christopherpostill]

lol don't worry about it man - i know understand your views on AMD and Socket A