PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

What benefit I get from Dynamic Volume?

 
 
didi
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      6th Aug 2003
I am setting up a database server running under W2K.
The machine has hardware mirrored system disk (2 disks)
and hardware raid disk (3 disks) for data.
I wonder if I get benefits by upgrading volume for data
from basic volume to Dynamic volume.

We are going to have intensive data access and some update
during day and batch data load at night.

Any suggestion is very welcome!

Didi

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ryan Anderson [MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      6th Aug 2003
If you aren't doing any software fault tolerance, I would leave the disk as
basic. Other than software fault tollerance, the only thing you would need a
dynamic disk for is to have a spanned volume. There will be no performance
boost from going to a dynamic disk.

Hope this helps,

--

Ryan Anderson MCSE
Directory Services
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
from your issue. Please do not send e-mail directly to this
alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.




"didi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:12da01c35be8$ea65b460$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I am setting up a database server running under W2K.
> The machine has hardware mirrored system disk (2 disks)
> and hardware raid disk (3 disks) for data.
> I wonder if I get benefits by upgrading volume for data
> from basic volume to Dynamic volume.
>
> We are going to have intensive data access and some update
> during day and batch data load at night.
>
> Any suggestion is very welcome!
>
> Didi
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Trapulo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Aug 2003
and formatting the file system with 64kb clusters size?

"Ryan Anderson [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> If you aren't doing any software fault tolerance, I would leave the disk

as
> basic. Other than software fault tollerance, the only thing you would need

a
> dynamic disk for is to have a spanned volume. There will be no performance
> boost from going to a dynamic disk.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --
>
> Ryan Anderson MCSE
> Directory Services
> =====================================================
> > >

> > Didi
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Basic Volume and Dynamic Volume sengke Windows XP Basics 2 25th Jun 2008 10:18 PM
Dynamic Volume jmrcook Microsoft Windows 2000 Hardware 1 8th May 2006 02:58 PM
Re: Dynamic Volume John John Microsoft Windows 2000 New Users 1 8th May 2006 04:52 AM
Re: Dynamic Volume John John Microsoft Windows 2000 1 8th May 2006 04:23 AM
Extending a Dynamic Volume? PMasters Microsoft Windows 2000 Hardware 0 29th Oct 2003 04:52 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 AM.