If you aren't doing any software fault tolerance, I would leave the disk as
basic. Other than software fault tollerance, the only thing you would need a
dynamic disk for is to have a spanned volume. There will be no performance
boost from going to a dynamic disk.
Hope this helps,
--
Ryan Anderson MCSE
Directory Services
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
from your issue. Please do not send e-mail directly to this
alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"didi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:12da01c35be8$ea65b460$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I am setting up a database server running under W2K.
> The machine has hardware mirrored system disk (2 disks)
> and hardware raid disk (3 disks) for data.
> I wonder if I get benefits by upgrading volume for data
> from basic volume to Dynamic volume.
>
> We are going to have intensive data access and some update
> during day and batch data load at night.
>
> Any suggestion is very welcome!
>
> Didi
>
|