Hi.

I am trying to understand how to use the Array.TakeWhile operator. In
my tests below, the first Array is filled but the second one is not:

Dim arTemp() As Integer = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}

Dim first() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i < 5).ToArray
Dim second() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i > 5).ToArray

Am I missing something?

Regards,
Robert

In the second is the first item already not true


"Robert Scheer" wrote in message
news:27be86ed-8ae7-4269-89a0-(E-Mail Removed)...

Hi.

I am trying to understand how to use the Array.TakeWhile operator. In
my tests below, the first Array is filled but the second one is not:

Dim arTemp() As Integer = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}

Dim first() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i < 5).ToArray
Dim second() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i > 5).ToArray

Am I missing something?

Regards,
Robert

* Robert Scheer <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> I am trying to understand how to use the Array.TakeWhile operator. In
> my tests below, the first Array is filled but the second one is not:

Btw, this is not an operator but an extension function of Linq and it's
not defined for Array but for Enumerables of all kinds.

> Dim arTemp() As Integer = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
>
> Dim first() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i < 5).ToArray
> Dim second() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i > 5).ToArray

That's exactly the specified behavior, TakeWhile starts at the first
element and stops when it finds one that doesn't fulfill your predicate.
0 clearly is NOT bigger than 5

I /guess/ you are actually looking for the Where() function

Regards, Felix

--
Felix Palmen (Zirias) + [PGP] Felix Palmen <(E-Mail Removed)>
web: http://palmen-it.de/ | http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
my open source projects: | Fingerprint: ED9B 62D0 BE39 32F9 2488
http://palmen-it.de/?pg=pro + 5D0C 8177 9D80 5ECF F683

On 31 ago, 12:46, fe...@palmen-it.de (Felix Palmen) wrote:
> * Robert Scheer <rbsch...@my-deja.com>:
>
> > I am trying to understand how to use the Array.TakeWhile operator. In
> > my tests below, the first Array is filled but the second one is not:
>
> Btw, this is not an operator but an extension function of Linq and it's
> not defined for Array but for Enumerables of all kinds.
>
> > Dim arTemp() As Integer = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
>
> > Dim first() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i < 5).ToArray
> > Dim second() As Integer = arTemp.TakeWhile(Function(i) i > 5).ToArray
>
> That's exactly the specified behavior, TakeWhile starts at the first
> element and stops when it finds one that doesn't fulfill your predicate.
> 0 clearly is NOT bigger than 5
>
> I /guess/ you are actually looking for the Where() function
>
> Regards, Felix
>
> --
> *Felix Palmen * * * (Zirias) *+ [PGP] Felix Palmen <fe...@palmen-it.de>
> *web: *http://palmen-it.de/*| * * * * * *http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
> *my open source projects: * * | * Fingerprint: ED9B 62D0 BE39 32F9 2488
> *http://palmen-it.de/?pg=pro*+ * * * * * * * *5D0C 8177 9D80 5ECF F683

Hi Felix,

thanks for the detailed explanation. I tried Where as you suggested me
and got what I want.

Can I assume that only Linq has these extension functions? How they
differ from a common method?

Regards,
Robert Scheer

Hi, Robert,

On 31 Aug., 19:20, Robert Scheer <rbsch...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> On 31 ago, 12:46, fe...@palmen-it.de (Felix Palmen) wrote:
> Can I assume that only Linq has these extension functions? How they
> differ from a common method?

No, Linq just makes intense use of those functions. They were
introduced in c# 3.0.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb383977.aspx has more
information about them.

HTH,
Markus

* Robert Scheer <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> Can I assume that only Linq has these extension functions? How they
> differ from a common method?

No, but Markus already explained that. Of course these extension methods
on enumerables you are using /are/ part of Linq, they are defined in the
System.Linq namespace.

The difference is these functions aren't really methods (they are not
defined inside the class they are operating on), but they behave as if
they were. So it is possible to extend the functionality of a class
without creating a derived class.

Regards, Felix

--
Felix Palmen (Zirias) + [PGP] Felix Palmen <(E-Mail Removed)>
web: http://palmen-it.de/ | http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
my open source projects: | Fingerprint: ED9B 62D0 BE39 32F9 2488
http://palmen-it.de/?pg=pro + 5D0C 8177 9D80 5ECF F683