PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

BCC effecting header size for recipient

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2hhcmxpZSBE?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2007
Hi,

I've tried to find an answer for this but I'm not sure I'm searching in the
right way, so I hope someone can help answer a question for me please.

Should the number of names in the BCC field in Outlook 2000 effect the size
of the final mail received by the recipient - i.e. if I send a 4KB mail to
50,000 recipients in the BCC field, would each individual mail, viewed by
each individual recipient, be over infated due to the size of the BCC header?
(This is a hypothetical question for corporate use not public use)

Thanks in advance.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?Utf-8?B?ZGx3?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2007
Don't even go there. Putting 50K recipients on one email is folly. You need
to use a mail merge.

"Charlie D" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've tried to find an answer for this but I'm not sure I'm searching in the
> right way, so I hope someone can help answer a question for me please.
>
> Should the number of names in the BCC field in Outlook 2000 effect the size
> of the final mail received by the recipient - i.e. if I send a 4KB mail to
> 50,000 recipients in the BCC field, would each individual mail, viewed by
> each individual recipient, be over infated due to the size of the BCC header?
> (This is a hypothetical question for corporate use not public use)
>
> Thanks in advance.

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2hhcmxpZSBE?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2007
It was a hypothetical number. I'm looking to see if there is an impact on
the message size for the recipient to explain that large numbers in the BCC
can cause an issue but I need the actual evidence, i.e. yes it does over
inflate the size of the mail for the recipient, before I went ahead.

Thanks.

"dlw" wrote:

> Don't even go there. Putting 50K recipients on one email is folly. You need
> to use a mail merge.
>
> "Charlie D" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to find an answer for this but I'm not sure I'm searching in the
> > right way, so I hope someone can help answer a question for me please.
> >
> > Should the number of names in the BCC field in Outlook 2000 effect the size
> > of the final mail received by the recipient - i.e. if I send a 4KB mail to
> > 50,000 recipients in the BCC field, would each individual mail, viewed by
> > each individual recipient, be over infated due to the size of the BCC header?
> > (This is a hypothetical question for corporate use not public use)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Font Size change for Recipient Sherry Microsoft Outlook Discussion 2 23rd Apr 2009 05:43 AM
Display header for Word doc when sent to recipient =?Utf-8?B?ZG1hcmU=?= Microsoft Word Document Management 3 6th Jul 2007 06:25 AM
Recipient appears twice in the message header Ed Microsoft Outlook 0 20th Jan 2006 03:01 PM
Don't want to print recipient's email addr in header =?Utf-8?B?RG90IE5haA==?= Microsoft Outlook Printing 1 25th Aug 2005 06:41 AM
header display in recipient mail yo Microsoft Outlook Discussion 1 30th Jun 2004 06:04 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.