It was a hypothetical number. I'm looking to see if there is an impact on
the message size for the recipient to explain that large numbers in the BCC
can cause an issue but I need the actual evidence, i.e. yes it does over
inflate the size of the mail for the recipient, before I went ahead.
Thanks.
"dlw" wrote:
> Don't even go there. Putting 50K recipients on one email is folly. You need
> to use a mail merge.
>
> "Charlie D" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to find an answer for this but I'm not sure I'm searching in the
> > right way, so I hope someone can help answer a question for me please.
> >
> > Should the number of names in the BCC field in Outlook 2000 effect the size
> > of the final mail received by the recipient - i.e. if I send a 4KB mail to
> > 50,000 recipients in the BCC field, would each individual mail, viewed by
> > each individual recipient, be over infated due to the size of the BCC header?
> > (This is a hypothetical question for corporate use not public use)
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
|