100MB/s for each ATA channel and 150MB/s for each sATA port.

Nobody has tryed measuring totals when using more than two at once.

"@drian" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:HyUnb.198753$(E-Mail Removed)...
| If a S-ATA controller embedded in the ICH5-R Southbridge of an Intel chipset
| provides 150MB/s, and the M/B that contains that Southbridge offers two
| S-ATA ports, is that 150MB/s on *each* channel or S-ATA port, or is it
| shared between both ports?
|

If a S-ATA controller embedded in the ICH5-R Southbridge of an Intel chipset
provides 150MB/s, and the M/B that contains that Southbridge offers two
S-ATA ports, is that 150MB/s on *each* channel or S-ATA port, or is it
shared between both ports?

Thank you.

@drian.

"Eric Gisin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)
> 100MB/s for each ATA channel and 150MB/s for each sATA port.
>
> Nobody has tryed measuring totals when using more than two at once.

Then consider c't to be a nobody.

>
> "@drian" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:HyUnb.198753$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > If a S-ATA controller embedded in the ICH5-R Southbridge of an Intel chipset
> > provides 150MB/s, and the M/B that contains that Southbridge offers two
> > S-ATA ports, is that 150MB/s on *each* channel or S-ATA port, or is it
> > shared between both ports?

150 MB each. Not shared.

--
DaveW



"@drian" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:HyUnb.198753$(E-Mail Removed)...
> If a S-ATA controller embedded in the ICH5-R Southbridge of an Intel
chipset
> provides 150MB/s, and the M/B that contains that Southbridge offers two
> S-ATA ports, is that 150MB/s on *each* channel or S-ATA port, or is it
> shared between both ports?
>
> Thank you.
>
> @drian.
>
>

"Eric Gisin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> 100MB/s for each ATA channel ...

I thought we were at 133MB/s? ...or is that for PCI add-in cards?

> ...and 150MB/s for each sATA port.

Got it. So two S-ATA drives on each port, with a 60MB/s throughput in a
RAID 0 situation, would be a simple case of doubling and would result in
120MB/s?

> Nobody has tryed measuring totals when using more than two at once.

Nobody has tried? Amazing.

@drian.

"Folkert Rienstra" <see_reply-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bnpm3v$145419$(E-Mail Removed)...
| "Eric Gisin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)
| > 100MB/s for each ATA channel and 150MB/s for each sATA port.
| >
| > Nobody has tryed measuring totals when using more than two at once.
|
| Then consider c't to be a nobody.
|
Did they test 4 ATA drives, or a mix of 3+ ATA/SATA drives? Did they get over
120MB/s?

"Eric Gisin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Folkert Rienstra" <see_reply-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:bnpm3v$145419$(E-Mail Removed)...
> | "Eric Gisin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)
> | > 100MB/s for each ATA channel and 150MB/s for each sATA port.
> | >
> | > Nobody has tryed measuring totals when using more than two at once.
> |
> | Then consider c't to be a nobody.
> |
> Did they test 4 ATA drives, or a mix of 3+ ATA/SATA drives? Did they
> get over 120MB/s?

2 ATA + 2 PATA. 200-220MB/s total.
The test is more to see what the MoBo chipset can do.


>