PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Backweb.exe file

 
 
JustLookin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003
Does anyone know what the file backweb-7288974.exe is ??
This file is trying to access the net but I've stopped it with my
firewall.
Thanks for your help.

Cheers.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
nicky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003

"JustLookin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
> Does anyone know what the file backweb-7288974.exe is ??
> This file is trying to access the net but I've stopped it with my
> firewall.
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Cheers.


A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or Ad-aware to
clean spyware from your system:

Ad-Aware:
http://www.lavasoft.de/software/adaware/
Spybot:
http://security.kolla.de/

Nicky


 
Reply With Quote
 
JustLookin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003
Thanks for the info everyone. I found out that it was installed by
several programs. Logitec (my webcam), Kodak (my digital cam) and
Media Player among them.
So it is very common and is installed without your knowing or consent.
Now if I delete the lot, and there is heaps of files related to
Backweb, I'm worried that it will affect the performance of my
computer. I'll just have to see what happens I spose :-(

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:10:40 GMT, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:56:25 +1000, JustLookin
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Does anyone know what the file backweb-7288974.exe is ??
>>This file is trying to access the net but I've stopped it with my
>>firewall.
>>Thanks for your help.

>
>BackWeb is included with the install disks of Win ME on my Hp
>Pavilion. I uninstalled it since it's loaded with spyware.
>
>Art
>http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg


 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeffrey A. Setaro
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, rogdon2003
@hotmail.com says...
> Does anyone know what the file backweb-7288974.exe is ??
> This file is trying to access the net but I've stopped it with my
> firewall.


Take a look @ <http://www.backweb.com>.

> Thanks for your help.
>


Your welcome.

--
Cheers-

Jeff Setaro
(E-Mail Removed)
http://people.mags.net/jasetaro/
PGP Key IDs DH/DSS: 0x5D41429D RSA: 0x599D2A99 New RSA: 0xA19EBD34
 
Reply With Quote
 
nicky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003

"FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

newsNPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or Ad-aware

to
> > clean spyware from your system:

>
> This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> and spyware.


Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for his AV
(if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element tagged
onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on spyware and
wouldn't alert on legit files.

Nicky


 
Reply With Quote
 
Sugien
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jul 2003

"nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:LD_Qa.13311$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

> newsNPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or Ad-aware

> to
> > > clean spyware from your system:

> >
> > This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> > The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> > Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> > having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> > autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> > and spyware.

>
> Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for his

AV
> (if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element tagged
> onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on spyware

and
> wouldn't alert on legit files.
>
> Nicky
>
>


Legitimate files *can* be (and are) used maliciously


--
/}
@###{ ]::::::::::ino-Soft Software::::::::::::>
\}
Live WebCam http://www.dino-soft.org/cam



 
Reply With Quote
 
FromTheRafters
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Jul 2003

"nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:LD_Qa.13311$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

> newsNPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or Ad-aware

> to
> > > clean spyware from your system:

> >
> > This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> > The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> > Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> > having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> > autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> > and spyware.

>
> Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for his AV
> (if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element tagged
> onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on spyware and
> wouldn't alert on legit files.


One would hope so, but the mere presence of that application
trying to access the internet is not necessarily an indication of
plunderware. IIRC someone had Ad-Aware alert on one once
and asked about it here, and a registry search indicated it was
a legit (?) (printer related?) update application.

I would be interested to know if indeed Ad-Aware and Spybot
Search and Destroy were able to discriminate between legit and
non-legit use of this application.


 
Reply With Quote
 
FromTheRafters
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Jul 2003

"Sugien" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:3E%Qa.122$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:LD_Qa.13311$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > >
> > > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

> > newsNPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or Ad-aware

> > to
> > > > clean spyware from your system:
> > >
> > > This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> > > The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> > > Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> > > having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> > > autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> > > and spyware.

> >
> > Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for his

> AV
> > (if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element tagged
> > onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on spyware

> and
> > wouldn't alert on legit files.
> >
> > Nicky
> >
> >

>
> Legitimate files *can* be (and are) used maliciously


Yes, but the question here is whether or not adware and or spyware
detection programs are capable of discerning the difference.

Nicky may be right, but I think I remember at least one instance
of falsely alerting to a legit "backweb" as spyware.


 
Reply With Quote
 
S.Heenan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Jul 2003

"FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I would be interested to know if indeed Ad-Aware and Spybot
> Search and Destroy were able to discriminate between legit and
> non-legit use of this application.


F-Secure Anti-Virus2003 uses Backweb as a means of providing updates. Spybot
S&D ver1.2 detects it by default. Deleting any of the ~20 registry entries
renders the anti-virus application inoperable. I don't recall how Ad-Aware
regards Backweb.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Sugien
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Jul 2003

"FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Sugien" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

news:3E%Qa.122$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:LD_Qa.13311$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > >
> > > "FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > >
> > > > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > newsNPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or

Ad-aware
> > > to
> > > > > clean spyware from your system:
> > > >
> > > > This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> > > > The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> > > > Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> > > > having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> > > > autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> > > > and spyware.
> > >
> > > Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for

his
> > AV
> > > (if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element

tagged
> > > onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on

spyware
> > and
> > > wouldn't alert on legit files.
> > >
> > > Nicky
> > >
> > >

> >
> > Legitimate files *can* be (and are) used maliciously

>
> Yes, but the question here is whether or not adware and or spyware
> detection programs are capable of discerning the difference.
>
> Nicky may be right, but I think I remember at least one instance
> of falsely alerting to a legit "backweb" as spyware.
>
>


I am not so sure they ( adware and or spyware detection programs ) can tell
the difference; because the same back web can be used by 2 different
applications at the same time , one legitimate and one not there for the
adware and or spyware detection programs would have to be far more powerful
then they are currently and would have to key on running processes instead
of *just* the name of the suspected adware. Hmmmm, I wonder if one were to
rename a backweb.exe file and then simply call and pipe into it using the
changed name if the adware and or spyware detection programs would still
find it? I don't think so; because I think as it stands now they are using
a simple library or list type of detection iow just going by the name of the
offending software and a simple renaming of it would bypass the detection by
the most popular adware and or spyware
detection programs.


--
/}
@###{ ]::::::::::ino-Soft Software::::::::::::>
\}
Live WebCam http://www.dino-soft.org/cam


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BackWeb =?Utf-8?B?R2FicmllbGxl?= Windows XP Help 1 31st Aug 2006 03:44 PM
backweb michael Windows XP General 8 11th Sep 2004 09:30 AM
What is the file "backweb-1940576.exe" for? Zack Windows XP Security 1 26th Apr 2004 03:42 AM
Re: Backweb.exe file Add Subtract Anti-Virus 1 19th Jul 2003 12:34 AM
Re: Backweb.exe file Add Subtract Anti-Virus 0 18th Jul 2003 11:01 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 AM.