"FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Sugien" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3E%Qa.122$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:LD_Qa.13311$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > >
> > > "FromTheRafters" <!(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > >
> > > > "nicky" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news
NPQa.12515$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > A quick Google shows it to be spyware. Download Spybot S+D or
Ad-aware
> > > to
> > > > > clean spyware from your system:
> > > >
> > > > This is where a "quick search of google" fails you.
> > > > The "Backweb" application has many legitimate uses.
> > > > Removing it with Ad-Aware might just result in no longer
> > > > having your AV definitions autoupdate. It is a legitimate
> > > > autoupdating service which has also been abused by adware
> > > > and spyware.
> > >
> > > Would Ad-aware not recognise it as being a legit auto update file for
his
> > AV
> > > (if thats what it turns out to be) rather than the spyware element
tagged
> > > onto other applications? I thought Ad-aware would only alert on
spyware
> > and
> > > wouldn't alert on legit files.
> > >
> > > Nicky
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Legitimate files *can* be (and are) used maliciously
>
> Yes, but the question here is whether or not adware and or spyware
> detection programs are capable of discerning the difference.
>
> Nicky may be right, but I think I remember at least one instance
> of falsely alerting to a legit "backweb" as spyware.
>
>
I am not so sure they ( adware and or spyware detection programs ) can tell
the difference; because the same back web can be used by 2 different
applications at the same time , one legitimate and one not there for the
adware and or spyware detection programs would have to be far more powerful
then they are currently and would have to key on running processes instead
of *just* the name of the suspected adware. Hmmmm, I wonder if one were to
rename a backweb.exe file and then simply call and pipe into it using the
changed name if the adware and or spyware detection programs would still
find it? I don't think so; because I think as it stands now they are using
a simple library or list type of detection iow just going by the name of the
offending software and a simple renaming of it would bypass the detection by
the most popular adware and or spyware
detection programs.
--
/}
@###{ ]::::::::::

ino-Soft Software::::::::::::>
\}
Live WebCam
http://www.dino-soft.org/cam