We are going to purchase two new servers running SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition
and IIS (web server) on Windows 2000. Would you purchase an internal tape
drive for the IIS server and backup the SQL database remotely? I am not
sure the advantages and disadvantages of the tape drive on either server.

Thanks.

"Diane Walker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ez1qLC%(E-Mail Removed)...
> We are going to purchase two new servers running SQL 2000 Enterprise
Edition
> and IIS (web server) on Windows 2000. Would you purchase an internal tape
> drive for the IIS server and backup the SQL database remotely? I am not
> sure the advantages and disadvantages of the tape drive on either server.
>

I still consider tape backup as the most efficient and reliable source.
I suppose there will be a high speed connection between de Web Server and de
SQL server, so it really doesn't matter where to put the backup drive
physically. ( I, personally, would go for a redundant backup system- 2
backup drives, one in either server, and backup alternately to each
ystem! - but then I am a cautious person and my data is CRITICAL!!)
It all depends on your budget. But if the data is mission critical, install
de tape in the SQL server ( less prone to attacks) and backup the IIS data
to the SQL server. Also I assume the IIS is a more static server then the
SQL, so the fastest actions are needed on the SQL server?

Success

&re