Hello,

Have you got a copy of akula's build of NFilter you could put into
a.b.f for me, pls?

jo <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Hello,
>
> Have you got a copy of akula's build of NFilter you could put into
> a.b.f for me, pls?

Did you read this article ?

http://sharkpost.isterrible.tv/enfilter.htm

--
Rod

Rod wrote:

>jo <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Have you got a copy of akula's build of NFilter you could put into
>> a.b.f for me, pls?
>
>Did you read this article ?
>
>http://sharkpost.isterrible.tv/enfilter.htm

Yep. The link tends to get posted anytime Sharkpost or akula's mod of
NFilter is mentioned.
They are both good apps and I am entirely happy with the pair of them.
The main reason I want this build of NFilter is to tidy up my headers
on this machine. But I can't find it.

jo <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Yep. The link tends to get posted anytime Sharkpost or akula's mod of
> NFilter is mentioned.

My apologies for being predictable.

> They are both good apps and I am entirely happy with the pair of them.

Fair enough.

> But I can't find it.

Neither can I, good luck.


--
Rod

Rod wrote:

>jo <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> Yep. The link tends to get posted anytime Sharkpost or akula's mod of
>> NFilter is mentioned.
>
>My apologies for being predictable.

No probs; the politics surrounding the apps are odd. I have neither
the time nor the inclination to even begin to understand the years of
feuding - claims/counter claims involved...

>> They are both good apps and I am entirely happy with the pair of them.

>Neither can I, good luck.

I doubt Vrodok has left usenet just yet. :-)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:58:17 +0000, in alt.comp.freeware, jo
<(E-Mail Removed)>, by way of Message-id
<(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Have you got a copy of akula's build of NFilter you could put into
>a.b.f for me, pls?

Sure, I'll post it there right after sending this up.


P.S. In response to that other "jump on the bandwagon" poster, I include
this link; http://sharkproductions.sphosting.com/, with the admonition to
scroll down a bit.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQCVAwUBQecCQu2J/4zOuEl1AQFYRgQA7KAbg9gA3TJfNUMD0F9mdGaIXhZ02pS2
3RZbntW3DFzuO8N4m1OfYoyVjAXqUtf8GI0p1eY42CT+Tk2LLg/fjSFhBsuSm1zn
tc77DUyt7dAsyrMnxlir3wOJSIG2JysU9zmX6AzJ1LtZbbhPhyDy2Or2u150o6DJ
sviwHU30WeM=
=PKWB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Vrodok the Troll <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> that other "jump on the bandwagon" poster

That would be me. Jumping again.
I read Jo's request, didn't know the program, wanted to know, googled,
didn't find the program, but found the article.
Absolutely don't have a need for the program, so couldn't care less if it
was $-ware, freeware, closed or open source.

Still, going from open source to source that's: "available to those I can
trust not to abuse it" smells a bit strange, but I'm just pointing my nose
in a different direction.


--
Rod

Vrodok the Troll wrote:

>>Have you got a copy of akula's build of NFilter you could put into
>>a.b.f for me, pls?
>
>Sure, I'll post it there right after sending this up.

Excellent. Many thx. Got it.

*checks headers*

Yep, better; happy now.

BTW... I like NFilter for the ability to filter on the XREF, and this
build cos it strips the headers. Have you ever managed to filter on
any other non standard header? If so, on what server and can you
provide their overview? I have spent years, on and off, with NFilter,
settling on it as a really useful tool a year or so ago when a
particularly nasty sporgery flood hit abc.

I don't suppose you know why NFilter claims to be able to filter on
'organisation', 'path', 'FU', 'NNTP-Posting-Host' etc etc etc, when it
so clearly can't IME?

But anyway... the supplementary questions are but an add on. My thx
are to you for a prompt response to my main req. :-)

*throws small pig*

"Rod" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Vrodok the Troll <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> that other "jump on the bandwagon" poster
>
> That would be me. Jumping again.
> I read Jo's request, didn't know the program, wanted to know, googled,
> didn't find the program, but found the article.
> Absolutely don't have a need for the program, so couldn't care less if it
> was $-ware, freeware, closed or open source.
>
> Still, going from open source to source that's: "available to those I can
> trust not to abuse it" smells a bit strange, but I'm just pointing my nose
> in a different direction.
>
>
> --
> Rod

When you "grow up" maybe you won't be so quick with an asinine answer.
Quoting you... "couldn't care less", if you don't care why do you post?
Quit smelling your "different directions".

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 13 Jan 2005 23:51:16 GMT, in alt.comp.freeware, Rod <(E-Mail Removed)>, by
way of Message-id <(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:

[snip]
>
>Still, going from open source to source that's: "available to those I can
>trust not to abuse it" smells a bit strange,

The source of an earlier release [of] SharkPost had been given out, only to
see it compiled, by those who wish the newsgroups ill, into what could only
be called an "*Abortion*" of a news "posting" app. I saw this "program";
pre-Win95 16-bit apps looked absolutely *Fantastic*, by comparison.

Taking my above-paragraph into consideration, "available to those I can
trust not to abuse it" does not (now) seem strange at all.

> but I'm just pointing my nose
>in a different direction.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQCVAwUBQedh0u2J/4zOuEl1AQFzFAQAqpwx9/YNNOeSmNjsE7QneJGa4yqJ/jIw
CfyozLMvYqEhMdUF1Ut/3eBMwQ8J2tJ3Olez2h/hkBIiwO1AkU8He06iDkT4qZyE
xkVrViaIThJs4aqnecICMJwbNo/7Wq8CQnzqtE/tafjT3hbJYXdi+7dnWwUx9LvK
B1XFXtCyNxI=
=3l9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----