I am having the same issue. I don't want to print the attachment, I just want
to be able to see what attachments have been sent with an email. So when I
print a copy of an emaill I can see the attchment icons.
"Mary" wrote:
> See if this helps --the key is the mail must be closed to print it:
> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/as...431731033.aspx
>
>
> "JJ Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > JJ Jones wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble getting the attachment icons to print when I print a
> > > mail message in "memo style". What is weird is that when I display the
> > > message in "print preview", the attachment icons are displayed. But
> > > when I click on "print", the message prints without the attachment
> > > icons displaying.
> > >
> > > I tried creating a copy of "memo style", thinking that the "memo style"
> > > that I was using was somehow modified, but that didn't do anything.
> > > Also, this phenomenon is not consistent, since in some cases the
> > > attachment icon DOES print. It seems that the file type of the
> > > attachment may be a factor.
> > >
> > > Is there some place where you can specifically DEFINE that the
> > > attachment icon is supposed to print in "memo style"?
> > >
> > > Is the property dictating whether or not the attachment icon prints
> > > associated with the individual message?
> > >
> > > This is Outlook 2000 running on either XP XP2, or Windows 98.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > According to Microsoft document 872839, this problem is fixed in Office
> > 2003 SP 1. That appears to be a lie, because I also have Office 2003
> > SP2 and the stupid HTML attachment icons STILL don't print if the
> > message is in HTML format.
> >
> > We get about a hundred messages a day in HTML format, and we're
> > supposed to go in and "edit message" each one just so that the stupid
> > attachment icon shows up???
> >
> > This appears to be one of the DUMBEST and most annoying glitches I have
> > come across yet, in the long and glorious history of stupid Microsoft
> > tricks. What possible reason is there that attachment icons should not
> > appear if the message is in HTML format???
> >
> > Excuse my fumes, but this is just really, really stupid.
> >
> >
Similar Threads
