<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:5ZWdnTCC7L8Jqh6iU-(E-Mail Removed)...
<Snip>
> > > > Ant, did you perchance install the all-in-one Cat 3.7 driver?
People
> > seem
> > > > to have been having problems with this not installing the capture
> > drivers
> > > > properly - it's a problematic capture driver installation that
causes
> > ATI
> > > > WDM Rage Theater Video to show with a yellow warning.
> > >
> > > Um, I don't remember the version number, but it was the latest one
from
> > ATI's
> > > Web site. I did not use the driver CD (always outdated). And also
please
> > note
> > > that I don't always get the yellow warning at every reboot. Just once
in a
> > > while.
> > >
>
> > What I mean is, Ant, did you install the all-in-one version of the
latest
> > driver (which is the Catalyst 3.7, but not, apparently for long) or the
> > separate capture/display/control panel modules for the same Cat 3.7?
>
> I am pretty sure it was one package:
> http://www2.ati.com/drivers/wxp-w2k-...10735c-efg.exe
> Is there a way to check?
>
>
> > It seems to be the all-in-one version as opposed to the separate modules
> > that's the problematic one.
>
> Aren't the separated package and combined packages the same? What's wrong
> with the all-in-one package version?
>
>
<snip>
--
> "PLEASE tell your aardvark that I'm NOT an anthill!" --unknown
> /\___/\
> / /\ /\ \ Ant @ The Ant Farm: http://antfarm.ma.cx
> | |o o| | E-mail: (E-Mail Removed)NT or (E-Mail Removed)NT
> \ _ / Remove ANT if replying by e-mail from a newsgroup.
> ( )
Theoretically, yes, Ant, the all-in-one driver should be exactly the same as
the three modules combined. However, when you install any or all of these
items, the installer has a lot of choices to make around your OS, videocard,
other software/hardware and probably a lot of other things in your system
environment too. The process is not always perfect - there are a _lot_ of
different possibilities it has to choose from to determine the optimum
install, even when you install each module separately. When you install the
all-in-one package, it has to make a lot more choices from a lot more
parameters all in one go, so the process is more likely to go wrong
somewhere.
This, of course gets more complicated if you do things like installing
straight over previous drivers, upgrading without uninstalling your MMC
software, or upgrading with all the other processes on your PC, particularly
virus checkers, firewalls etc. running. To get the best result, you want to
make it as easy as possible for that poor little installer. I always
precede an upgrade by uninstalling the MMC software, the control panel and
the display driver, using a good system tool like the registry tool of jv16
Power Tools suite to remove all the registry entries that ATi's somewhat
inadequate uninstall routines (if their uninstall routines are patently so
bad, why expect more of their install routines?) fails to remove, and
deleting all ATi files off my system. Oh, and I usually remove ATI WDM Rage
Theater Video and Specialized MVD WDM VBI Codec entries in Device Manager
for good measure - they're usually replaced, but sometimes get duplicated.
It may sound complicated, but once you get your routine down, it doesn't
take long, and it prevents a lot of problems before they can occur. I know
that a lot of people just install straight over their old drivers every
time, and say they have no problems, but I have to wonder how much better
their systems would be running if they _did_ take a little more trouble over
their upgrades.
The bottom line for you is that ATi's all-in-one drivers usually do seem to
throw up problems that the separate ones avoid, and I have seen mention of
people who've installed the all-in-one Catalyst 3.7 (which was the latest
when you posted; Cat 3.8s are out now) driver having problems with the
devices that the capture driver manages. Think about it.
patrickp