well i never got a answer to my question - the date was an error - but you
are welcome to your own opinion. i assure everyone it was harmless. i never
thought that changing the date would keep my post on the top. sorry to all -
god bless..i have since made the needed corrections.
"Mike P" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:86Spc.41031$(E-Mail Removed)...
> oe top posts by default and I don't care enough to change it. And anyone
> who judges anothers intellect by whether or not they top post is below
> average themselves.
>
> "Morrmar" <(E-Mail Removed)-no spam> wrote in message
> news:0SPpc.10894$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > So is anyone who changes the date to keep their post on top of all the
> > > "little people's".
> >
> > It's possible the guy's date is accidentally screwed up and besides, not
> > everyone sorts by date. It's still not as bad as top posting morons.
> >
> > To answer the op's question, go here:
> >
> > www.digitalfaq.com/capture/atimpeg/atimpeg
> >
> >
>
>