http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html

Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit

--
Tony DiMarzio
(E-Mail Removed)
(E-Mail Removed)

Bah, small differences. Enable sound, and performance usually drops a lot
more than that.

--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."

"Tony DiMarzio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html
>
> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit

Tony DiMarzio wrote:
> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html
>
> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit

Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed this one.
Games lock up after a few seconds.
At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is well.

"JT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:W4-dncZksNP6SerZRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Tony DiMarzio wrote:
>> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html
>>
>> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit
>
> Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed this
> one. Games lock up after a few seconds.
> At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is well.
>

Hmmm, sad that, pretty sure they're giving me around 10FPS faster in BF2
than the 6.4's !!


--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.

'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable notion
that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often led to
accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what that
reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be skeptical of
someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn

In article <Z8CdnWwT9tq50-(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> "JT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:W4-dncZksNP6SerZRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Tony DiMarzio wrote:
> >> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html
> >>
> >> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit
> >
> > Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed this
> > one. Games lock up after a few seconds.
> > At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is well.
> >
>
> Hmmm, sad that, pretty sure they're giving me around 10FPS faster in BF2
> than the 6.4's !!
>
>
>
6.5 caused a noticeable degradation in WoW for me. Rolled back to 6.4
and all is well. Will wait for the 6.6's ...
--
bc

Bob Cronin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> In article <Z8CdnWwT9tq50-(E-Mail Removed)>,
> (E-Mail Removed) says...
>>
>> "JT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:W4-dncZksNP6SerZRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Tony DiMarzio wrote:
>> >> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...5_performance_
>> >> analysis/index.html
>> >>
>> >> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit
>> >
>> > Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed
>> > this one. Games lock up after a few seconds.
>> > At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is
>> > well.
>> >
>>
>> Hmmm, sad that, pretty sure they're giving me around 10FPS faster in
>> BF2 than the 6.4's !!

>>
> 6.5 caused a noticeable degradation in WoW for me. Rolled back to 6.4
> and all is well. Will wait for the 6.6's ...

There's so many bug fixes listed in the release notes of this version that
I don't doubt they broke new things fixing all that stuff. I'll wait for
6.6.

Also wouldn't be surprised if the 'Adaptive AA' they've introduced for
older cards causes an instant performance hit if they enable it by default
for those cards.

On Wed, 31 May 2006 21:21:24 -0500, Nonymous
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Bob Cronin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> In article <Z8CdnWwT9tq50-(E-Mail Removed)>,
>> (E-Mail Removed) says...
>>>
>>> "JT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:W4-dncZksNP6SerZRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> > Tony DiMarzio wrote:
>>> >> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...5_performance_
>>> >> analysis/index.html
>>> >>
>>> >> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit
>>> >
>>> > Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed
>>> > this one. Games lock up after a few seconds.
>>> > At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is
>>> > well.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Hmmm, sad that, pretty sure they're giving me around 10FPS faster in
>>> BF2 than the 6.4's !!
>
>>>
>> 6.5 caused a noticeable degradation in WoW for me. Rolled back to 6.4
>> and all is well. Will wait for the 6.6's ...
>
>There's so many bug fixes listed in the release notes of this version that
>I don't doubt they broke new things fixing all that stuff. I'll wait for
>6.6.
>
>Also wouldn't be surprised if the 'Adaptive AA' they've introduced for
>older cards causes an instant performance hit if they enable it by default
>for those cards.

My thought on the subject would be that they allow more image quality
to down grade the gaming experience and by this getting people to buy
new stuff.

It's just like putting more detail in the option tab it require more
power from the graphic card. I remember once changing from an older
version of drivers and then notice that the image quality was less
details and by that increasing the fps.

In example in oblivion if i'm ok, there less grass going from 6.4 to
6.5 but i cloud be wrong and its not what i smoke. (little joke
here)...

Plus it is said on ati web site that on some older card that it can
add more fps going from 6.4 to 6.5 if i'm ok. Ie: up to 30% more of
fps in ut2004. I wonder where they cut in the rendering on those
cards. Maybe on the number of object that appear in games in a certain
distance.

On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:24:08 -0400, "JT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Tony DiMarzio wrote:
>> http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/90...sis/index.html
>>
>> Looks like X1900XT(X) performance has taken a small hit
>
>Haven't had to roll back a driver in a long time until I installed this one.
>Games lock up after a few seconds.
>At least the VPU feature worked. Rolled back to 6.4 and all is well.
>


I have a Radeon X850 XT and I just tested the sleep button on my
machine, Abit NF7-S AMD 3200, and not only did it go to sleep - that
part always happened - but it came out of sleep too!! Wow. I can't
remember the last ATI driver I installed when that would work for me.

This one is a keeper, at least for me.

Al

> My thought on the subject would be that they allow more image quality
> to down grade the gaming experience and by this getting people to buy
> new stuff.


there updates add years to the lifespan and performance of mine.



>
> It's just like putting more detail in the option tab it require more
> power from the graphic card. I remember once changing from an older
> version of drivers and then notice that the image quality was less
> details and by that increasing the fps.
>
> In example in oblivion if i'm ok, there less grass going from 6.4 to
> 6.5 but i cloud be wrong and its not what i smoke. (little joke
> here)...
>
> Plus it is said on ati web site that on some older card that it can
> add more fps going from 6.4 to 6.5 if i'm ok. Ie: up to 30% more of
> fps in ut2004. I wonder where they cut in the rendering on those
> cards. Maybe on the number of object that appear in games in a certain
> distance.

Wow, that what you got out of reading this....
-- snip -- snip --

As with most Catalyst® releases, performance has increased in various situations. The PCI Express bandwidth optimization code in
Catalyst® 6.5 brings performance improvements for both the ATI Radeon® X1600 and Radeon® X1300 Crossfire configurations, including:
a.. Up to 23% gain in UT2004
b.. Up to 20% gain in Splinter Cell
-- snip -- snip --