PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Athlon 2200+ too slow for video capture?

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?TW92aWVNYW4=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Jan 2004
Hello

I am capturing via Firewire and saving as WM9 with the setting "High quality PAL, variable bit rate". My processor is close to 100% all the time and when I play the final movie it has dropped frames. If I lower the bit rate to under 1 Mbps it plays smoothly. But I want highest quality since I am doing my film for DVD.

Is an AMD Athlon 2200+ with 512Mb ram too slow for encoding HQ 720x526? I have tried both saving in DV and WM format. What am I doing wrong?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
PapaJohn \(MVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Feb 2004
It sounds like you have all the frames, but the playback is dropping what it
needs to in order to keep up with the real-time flow of data. If that's the
case and the issue is simply with playback on the computer, then you can
render your movie to DV-AVI and produce your DVD. It should play fine on
your DVD player.

You can encode on a less powerful computer than what is needed to play it
back smoothly.

PapaJohn

"MovieMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:620ECE34-39EB-4FD8-9212-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello,
>
> I am capturing via Firewire and saving as WM9 with the setting "High

quality PAL, variable bit rate". My processor is close to 100% all the time
and when I play the final movie it has dropped frames. If I lower the bit
rate to under 1 Mbps it plays smoothly. But I want highest quality since I
am doing my film for DVD.
>
> Is an AMD Athlon 2200+ with 512Mb ram too slow for encoding HQ 720x526? I

have tried both saving in DV and WM format. What am I doing wrong?


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?TW92aWVNYW4=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Feb 2004
I think it goes wrong during capture and saving, not on playback. The first two minutes of my stream plays fine but then it stops dropping frames. If I watch the Task Manager the CPU usage is 100% the first two minutes and then drops to 30% for the rest of my capture. Its like he is giving up saying "I cannot hold this up anylonger" and start dropping.

I am no expert but realtime encoding from the camera must be much more tough for the CPU than playback?

 
Reply With Quote
 
PapaJohn \(MVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Feb 2004
It's the hard drive condition - like free space, defrag, buffer settings,
speed.... that's most important for capture.

PapaJohn.

"MovieMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:85994A71-E5E5-45DC-88FE-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I think it goes wrong during capture and saving, not on playback. The

first two minutes of my stream plays fine but then it stops dropping frames.
If I watch the Task Manager the CPU usage is 100% the first two minutes and
then drops to 30% for the rest of my capture. Its like he is giving up
saying "I cannot hold this up anylonger" and start dropping.
>
> I am no expert but realtime encoding from the camera must be much more

tough for the CPU than playback?
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade from a Athlon XP 2200? futurephonic Asus Motherboards 6 18th Jul 2005 12:29 AM
Quiet AMD Athlon XP 2200+ CPU Fan Paul Trimble \(ACITP\) DIY PC 7 23rd Jan 2005 09:39 AM
overheating athlon 2200 KingCreole Processors 8 2nd Oct 2004 08:26 PM
AMD Athlon XP 2200 perhaps damaged... Jeff Ward DIY PC 1 31st Jul 2003 09:43 PM
Retail fan on Athlon XP 2200+ (1.8 Ghz) Bebert DIY PC 1 16th Jul 2003 12:19 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM.