PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Async Pluggable Protocol vs. WebRequest

 
 
Pete Davis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Jan 2004
I have an app that needs to work with its own uri scheme. Instead of http:,
I'm going to use wwkb:

I will register my uri prefix to run my app, and it only needs to be
available when my app is running.

Here's where it gets tricky. wwkb: will retrieve HTML from a database. I'm
going to have a web browser control in a window and I want to retrieve the
HTML from the database and then display it in the web browser. The links in
the HTML will be converted to wwkb: links instead of html links, so the web
browser needs to be able to accept that.

Will overriding WebRequest do this and if so, is there any sample code
anyone can recommend? The MSDN docs haven't been great on this.

I'd rather not go with the Async Pluggable Protocols architecture, if
possible since it looks like there are some issues implementing the COM
components properly in managed code.

Thanks.

Pete



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlook and processing of Asynchronous Pluggable Protocol URL scoroop Microsoft Outlook 1 12th Sep 2006 10:52 AM
How To Write Pluggable Protocol to Support MMS to download Streami =?Utf-8?B?UGV0ZXI=?= Microsoft Dot NET Framework 0 1st Apr 2005 02:11 PM
WebRequest/WebResponse Pluggable Protocol Question Jacob Microsoft Dot NET Framework 2 9th May 2004 04:20 PM
Async Pluggable Protocol vs. WebRequest Pete Davis Microsoft C# .NET 0 10th Jan 2004 01:34 PM
Pluggable Protocol Johannes Microsoft C# .NET 2 16th Oct 2003 04:02 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.