PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

asp verses html/htm

 
 
CD
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or the
other?


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Murray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
ASP pages are processed by the server before being uploaded to the client
browser. This means that you can do things 'server-side' with ASP that you
cannot do client-side with plain HTML - like interact with a database on the
server.

Because there is this additional overhead of server processing, then
performance may well be impacted. But this price is more than offset by the
extra capabilities you have.

If you are not sure about the differences here then you need to stick with
plain htm(l) pages! 8)

--
Murray
============

"CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
> the other?
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
CD
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Thanks Murray.

That is my point we have a few here that do ALL pages with asp extension.
Most are just plain pages no db stuff, no special coding behind the scenes.


"Murray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> ASP pages are processed by the server before being uploaded to the client
> browser. This means that you can do things 'server-side' with ASP that
> you cannot do client-side with plain HTML - like interact with a database
> on the server.
>
> Because there is this additional overhead of server processing, then
> performance may well be impacted. But this price is more than offset by
> the extra capabilities you have.
>
> If you are not sure about the differences here then you need to stick with
> plain htm(l) pages! 8)
>
> --
> Murray
> ============
>
> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>> the other?
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Murray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
One rationale for always using ASP extensions (whether the pages contain
VBScript or not) would be that at some point in the future, you plan on
adding dynamic scripting to the pages. When you do that, you wouldn't then
have to a) relink your menus, or b) worry about SE ranking on pages that
have now been renamed....

--
Murray
============

"CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks Murray.
>
> That is my point we have a few here that do ALL pages with asp extension.
> Most are just plain pages no db stuff, no special coding behind the
> scenes.
>
>
> "Murray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> ASP pages are processed by the server before being uploaded to the client
>> browser. This means that you can do things 'server-side' with ASP that
>> you cannot do client-side with plain HTML - like interact with a database
>> on the server.
>>
>> Because there is this additional overhead of server processing, then
>> performance may well be impacted. But this price is more than offset by
>> the extra capabilities you have.
>>
>> If you are not sure about the differences here then you need to stick
>> with plain htm(l) pages! 8)
>>
>> --
>> Murray
>> ============
>>
>> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>>> the other?
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Kevin Spencer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Here's an ASP verse for you:

ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.

But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
If you push something hard enough,
it will fall over.
- Fudd's First Law of Opposition

"CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
> the other?
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Murray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Nice one. Is that yours?

--
Murray
============

"Kevin Spencer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Here's an ASP verse for you:
>
> ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
> Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
> It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
> Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
> Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
> And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.
>
> But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
> And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
> Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
> The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
> I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
> Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.
>
> --
> HTH,
>
> Kevin Spencer
> Microsoft MVP
> .Net Developer
> If you push something hard enough,
> it will fall over.
> - Fudd's First Law of Opposition
>
> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>> the other?
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Fabulous!
do you have one for .aspx?

--
Chris Leeds,
Microsoft MVP-FrontPage

If you make web sites for other people, you should check out ContentSeed:
http://contentseed.com/
--
"Kevin Spencer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Here's an ASP verse for you:
>
> ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
> Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
> It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
> Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
> Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
> And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.
>
> But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
> And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
> Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
> The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
> I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
> Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.
>
> --
> HTH,
>
> Kevin Spencer
> Microsoft MVP
> .Net Developer
> If you push something hard enough,
> it will fall over.
> - Fudd's First Law of Opposition
>
> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>> the other?
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Murray
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
What rhymes with *that*?

--
Murray
============

"Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Fabulous!
> do you have one for .aspx?
>
> --
> Chris Leeds,
> Microsoft MVP-FrontPage
>
> If you make web sites for other people, you should check out ContentSeed:
> http://contentseed.com/
> --
> "Kevin Spencer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Here's an ASP verse for you:
>>
>> ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
>> Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
>> It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
>> Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
>> Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
>> And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.
>>
>> But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
>> And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
>> Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
>> The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
>> I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
>> Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.
>>
>> --
>> HTH,
>>
>> Kevin Spencer
>> Microsoft MVP
>> .Net Developer
>> If you push something hard enough,
>> it will fall over.
>> - Fudd's First Law of Opposition
>>
>> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>>> the other?
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Kevin Spencer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
I made it up on the spot.

--

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
If you push something hard enough,
it will fall over.
- Fudd's First Law of Opposition

"Murray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Nice one. Is that yours?
>
> --
> Murray
> ============
>
> "Kevin Spencer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Here's an ASP verse for you:
>>
>> ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
>> Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
>> It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
>> Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
>> Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
>> And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.
>>
>> But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
>> And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
>> Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
>> The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
>> I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
>> Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.
>>
>> --
>> HTH,
>>
>> Kevin Spencer
>> Microsoft MVP
>> .Net Developer
>> If you push something hard enough,
>> it will fall over.
>> - Fudd's First Law of Opposition
>>
>> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>>> the other?
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Kevin Spencer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
ASP.Net, it seems, is all the rage these days,
It's object-oriented, compiled, and strong in all its ways.
Of course, that doesn't make it any easier to do it,
In fact, because it's powerful, it's harder to get through it,
With time, it gets much easier, and object-orientation,
Has lots to offer programmers, in terms of computation.

Still, JavaScript, HTML, HTTP and so on
Are quite a lot to master, and I can think of no one
Who knows them all quite perfectly, and even though we try,
The standards keep on changing, like them clouds up in the sky.
But work and study never killed a single soul, you know,
So, get up off your lazy a**, and crack them books now Joe!

--
;-),

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
If you push something hard enough,
it will fall over.
- Fudd's First Law of Opposition


"Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Fabulous!
> do you have one for .aspx?
>
> --
> Chris Leeds,
> Microsoft MVP-FrontPage
>
> If you make web sites for other people, you should check out ContentSeed:
> http://contentseed.com/
> --
> "Kevin Spencer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Here's an ASP verse for you:
>>
>> ASP is technology that renders stuff on pages,
>> Not static stuff, dynamic stuff; it's been around for ages.
>> It got its roots from CGI, but went a little farther,
>> Because it mixes template code with script, and saves the bother
>> Of making changes in your code when changes come (no doubt),
>> And locating the code entwined with markup all throughout.
>>
>> But if you're not a programmer, and many of us aren't,
>> And if you haven't got a clue what ASP is, darn it,
>> Just ".html" will do, forget about this stuff.
>> The life of a programmer is really kind of rough.
>> I know, I are one, and although I love to code all day,
>> Not many of us do. And now I bid you a good-day.
>>
>> --
>> HTH,
>>
>> Kevin Spencer
>> Microsoft MVP
>> .Net Developer
>> If you push something hard enough,
>> it will fall over.
>> - Fudd's First Law of Opposition
>>
>> "CD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is there a guideline as to using asp or html/htm pages? If it is just a
>>> static pages is it best one or the other? Performance better for one or
>>> the other?
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
x86 verses x64 Carl G Windows Vista Performance 7 6th Feb 2009 03:42 PM
VB.Net verses ASP.Net William Microsoft Dot NET 2 12th Jan 2004 05:05 AM
C# verses VB.Net Which Way to go Robert Lario Microsoft VB .NET 19 10th Nov 2003 12:29 PM
C# verses VB.Net Which Way to go Robert Lario Microsoft C# .NET 9 9th Nov 2003 09:18 AM
C# verses VB.Net Which Way to go Robert Lario Microsoft VB .NET 14 24th Oct 2003 08:49 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 PM.