If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to attend,
the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically covers
the entire company, instead of just going to the two
individuals that I had intended it to go to. I also get
people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it to.
One person sent me the email back and it showed as if the
Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the individual
names of the two people I wanted were not even in the
list? Does anyone know why?

Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I invite
any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
Except for this one user. If I add the one user then
instead of going to that person, it goes to the three
groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one user.
Has anyone ever seen this before?


>-----Original Message-----
>If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to attend,
>the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
covers
>the entire company, instead of just going to the two
>individuals that I had intended it to go to. I also get
>people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it to.
>One person sent me the email back and it showed as if
the
>Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
individual
>names of the two people I wanted were not even in the
>list? Does anyone know why?
>.
>

Did that user set the group as a delegate?
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Outlook and Exchange solutions at http://www.slipstick.com
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx


<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I invite
> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
> Except for this one user. If I add the one user then
> instead of going to that person, it goes to the three
> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one user.
> Has anyone ever seen this before?
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to attend,
> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
> covers
> >the entire company, instead of just going to the two
> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I also get
> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it to.
> >One person sent me the email back and it showed as if
> the
> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
> individual
> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in the
> >list? Does anyone know why?
> >.
> >

No. No one actually used the group at all. They just
exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other is
Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I set up
this meeting for this one person and no one else as a
test. By sending it to her, it really went to the three
groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at their
replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
three groups and not to any individual user at all.

>-----Original Message-----
>Did that user set the group as a delegate?
>--
>Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
>Outlook and Exchange solutions at
http://www.slipstick.com
>Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
>
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I invite
>> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
>> Except for this one user. If I add the one user then
>> instead of going to that person, it goes to the three
>> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one user.
>> Has anyone ever seen this before?
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
attend,
>> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
>> covers
>> >the entire company, instead of just going to the two
>> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I also
get
>> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it
to.
>> >One person sent me the email back and it showed as if
>> the
>> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
>> individual
>> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in the
>> >list? Does anyone know why?
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>

I still say that the likely explanation is that user has a delegate set. Or
maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as alternate recipients?
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Outlook and Exchange solutions at http://www.slipstick.com
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> No. No one actually used the group at all. They just
> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other is
> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I set up
> this meeting for this one person and no one else as a
> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the three
> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at their
> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?

> >
> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I invite
> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user then
> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the three
> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one user.
> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
> attend,
> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
> >> covers
> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the two
> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I also
> get
> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it
> to.
> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed as if
> >> the
> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
> >> individual
> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in the
> >> >list? Does anyone know why?
> >> >.
> >> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >

If you remove a delegate set, do you have to restart any
of the services for it to take effect? There was a set
and it was removed, but the test that followed resulted
in the same three groups getting the message.

>-----Original Message-----
>I still say that the likely explanation is that user has
a delegate set. Or
>maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as
alternate recipients?
>--
>Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
>Outlook and Exchange solutions at
http://www.slipstick.com
>Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> No. No one actually used the group at all. They just
>> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other is
>> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I set up
>> this meeting for this one person and no one else as a
>> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the
three
>> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
>> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at
their
>> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
>> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?
>
>> >
>> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I
invite
>> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
>> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user
then
>> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the
three
>> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one
user.
>> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
>> attend,
>> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
>> >> covers
>> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the
two
>> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I
also
>> get
>> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it
>> to.
>> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed as
if
>> >> the
>> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
>> >> individual
>> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in
the
>> >> >list? Does anyone know why?
>> >> >.
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>

I removed everything in the delegate set, restarted all
of the Microsoft Exchange services, by stopping them
first, then starting, and sent an appt inviting this one
user and one other. I got an email back to me asking me
to "Please respond on behalf of 'user'" Where 'user' is
the one I'm having the issues with. So I choose to
Decline and I get an email back saying that I have
declined on that users behalf.

>-----Original Message-----
>If you remove a delegate set, do you have to restart any
>of the services for it to take effect? There was a set
>and it was removed, but the test that followed resulted
>in the same three groups getting the message.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>I still say that the likely explanation is that user
has
>a delegate set. Or
>>maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as
>alternate recipients?
>>--
>>Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
>>Outlook and Exchange solutions at
>http://www.slipstick.com
>>Author of
>> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
>> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
>> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>>
>><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> No. No one actually used the group at all. They just
>>> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other is
>>> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I set
up
>>> this meeting for this one person and no one else as a
>>> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the
>three
>>> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
>>> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at
>their
>>> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
>>> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
>>>
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?
>>
>>> >
>>> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>>> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I
>invite
>>> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
>>> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user
>then
>>> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the
>three
>>> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one
>user.
>>> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
>>> attend,
>>> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
>>> >> covers
>>> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the
>two
>>> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I
>also
>>> get
>>> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent
it
>>> to.
>>> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed
as
>if
>>> >> the
>>> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
>>> >> individual
>>> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in
>the
>>> >> >list? Does anyone know why?
>>> >> >.
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >.
>>> >
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>.
>

Permission changes may take a couple of hours to be applied. You might need
to look at permissions on parent containers as well.

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:02d401c3cc27$a7effe60$(E-Mail Removed)...
> If you remove a delegate set, do you have to restart any
> of the services for it to take effect? There was a set
> and it was removed, but the test that followed resulted
> in the same three groups getting the message.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >I still say that the likely explanation is that user has
> a delegate set. Or
> >maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as
> alternate recipients?
> >
> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> No. No one actually used the group at all. They just
> >> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other is
> >> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I set up
> >> this meeting for this one person and no one else as a
> >> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the
> three
> >> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
> >> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at
> their
> >> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
> >> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?
> >
> >> >
> >> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I
> invite
> >> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is OK
> >> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user
> then
> >> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the
> three
> >> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one
> user.
> >> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
> >> attend,
> >> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which basically
> >> >> covers
> >> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the
> two
> >> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I
> also
> >> get
> >> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I sent it
> >> to.
> >> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed as
> if
> >> >> the
> >> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
> >> >> individual
> >> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even in
> the
> >> >> >list? Does anyone know why?

I cannot explain the situation. My associate had created
the user and when I found the three groups in the
Delegate set he said he never set that up. I had the
user export what she needed to a pst file and I blew the
user away and recreated her. No problems so far. Sue, I
want to thank you very much for responding to my
inquiry. It helps me to know that as I continue to build
boxes with Microsoft software that there are people like
yourself that are available when issues arise. Thank you
very much.

Jeff

>-----Original Message-----
>Permission changes may take a couple of hours to be
applied. You might need
>to look at permissions on parent containers as well.
>
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:02d401c3cc27$a7effe60$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> If you remove a delegate set, do you have to restart
any
>> of the services for it to take effect? There was a set
>> and it was removed, but the test that followed resulted
>> in the same three groups getting the message.
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >I still say that the likely explanation is that user
has
>> a delegate set. Or
>> >maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as
>> alternate recipients?
>> >
>> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> >news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> No. No one actually used the group at all. They
just
>> >> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other
is
>> >> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I
set up
>> >> this meeting for this one person and no one else as
a
>> >> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the
>> three
>> >> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
>> >> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at
>> their
>> >> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
>> >> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>> >> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I
>> invite
>> >> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is
OK
>> >> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user
>> then
>> >> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the
>> three
>> >> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one
>> user.
>> >> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
>> >> attend,
>> >> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which
basically
>> >> >> covers
>> >> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the
>> two
>> >> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I
>> also
>> >> get
>> >> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I
sent it
>> >> to.
>> >> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed
as
>> if
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
>> >> >> individual
>> >> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even
in
>> the
>> >> >> >list? Does anyone know why?
>
>
>.
>

It's a shame when you have to use brute force to resolve an issue like this,
but happily, it usually works. Glad to hear you're running smoothly so far.

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:049201c3ce7b$98b11ff0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I cannot explain the situation. My associate had created
> the user and when I found the three groups in the
> Delegate set he said he never set that up. I had the
> user export what she needed to a pst file and I blew the
> user away and recreated her. No problems so far. Sue, I
> want to thank you very much for responding to my
> inquiry. It helps me to know that as I continue to build
> boxes with Microsoft software that there are people like
> yourself that are available when issues arise. Thank you
> very much.
>
> Jeff
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Permission changes may take a couple of hours to be
> applied. You might need
> >to look at permissions on parent containers as well.
> >
> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:02d401c3cc27$a7effe60$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> If you remove a delegate set, do you have to restart
> any
> >> of the services for it to take effect? There was a set
> >> and it was removed, but the test that followed resulted
> >> in the same three groups getting the message.
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >I still say that the likely explanation is that user
> has
> >> a delegate set. Or
> >> >maybe that somebody's mailbox has the groups set as
> >> alternate recipients?
> >> >
> >> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> >news:01be01c3cc0b$62ab0eb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >> No. No one actually used the group at all. They
> just
> >> >> exist in exchange. One group is ITHelp, the other
> is
> >> >> Remote Users, the third is Main Office Users. I
> set up
> >> >> this meeting for this one person and no one else as
> a
> >> >> test. By sending it to her, it really went to the
> >> three
> >> >> groups. Then each of the others in the firm were
> >> >> replying to it on behalf of her. I took a look at
> >> their
> >> >> replies and it was listed in the TO: as going to the
> >> >> three groups and not to any individual user at all.
> >> >>
> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >Did that user set the group as a delegate?
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> ><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message
> >> >> >news:00f001c3cbda$6dc39870$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >> >> Let me add something. There are 10 users. If I
> >> invite
> >> >> >> any of them individually, it goes to them and is
> OK
> >> >> >> Except for this one user. If I add the one user
> >> then
> >> >> >> instead of going to that person, it goes to the
> >> three
> >> >> >> groups. So I have narrowed the issue down to one
> >> user.
> >> >> >> Has anyone ever seen this before?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >If I set up a meeting and ask two individuals to
> >> >> attend,
> >> >> >> >the email goes out to three GROUPS which
> basically
> >> >> >> covers
> >> >> >> >the entire company, instead of just going to the
> >> two
> >> >> >> >individuals that I had intended it to go to. I
> >> also
> >> >> get
> >> >> >> >people accepting on behalf of others that I
> sent it
> >> >> to.
> >> >> >> >One person sent me the email back and it showed
> as
> >> if
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >Three Groups were the one I sent it to and the
> >> >> >> individual
> >> >> >> >names of the two people I wanted were not even
> in
> >> the
> >> >> >> >list? Does anyone know why?
> >
> >
> >.
> >