1) Not without a 3rd party tool.
2) No, since a file creation date has nothing to do with a mail received
date.
Note that you are basically already using a workaround. Pst-files are still
the way to go. They are much more flexible to search in and are more
efficient than storing in multiple msg-files.
If you are interested in archiving to an "open format" you might want to
consider using this archiving solution;
http://addins.howto-outlook.com/mapilab_archiver
If you decide to order use 4PM76A8 to get a discount.
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers
-----
"Dino Vilimek" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi there,
>
> For reasons that are difficult to explain, I've been archiving Outlook
> e-mail by dragging and dropping into another folder and burning on CD's.
> My end customer prefers not to use PSF files. Definately, there are some
> issues with this method, but I'm hoping I might get some advice on how to
> mitigate this or use a different technique. My issues are:
>
> 1. Is there a way to have the title of the resulting e-mail files named
> using both the name of the sender and the subject line (eg. filename is
> private.php?do=newpm&u= - Subject Line)? Right now, the files are named by
> subject line only, which leads to alot of ambiguous filenames. When I
> used to archive e-mail through SquirrelMail webmail, the resulting files
> were bundled into a zip file and named by sender/subject, so I know this
> is possible.
>
> 2. Right now, the date modified/created of the resulting drag/drop files
> are the date of the download, not the date the e-mail was sent. Any work
> arounds?
>
> Really appreciate any suggestions.
> Many thanks!
> Dino