it's just easier to have this as one sproc instead of 7 queries.
one sproc -- instead of 7 queries.
one sproc -- instead of 7 queries.
one sproc -- instead of 7 queries.
one sproc -- instead of 7 queries.
one sproc -- instead of 7 queries.
doesn't it just sound soothing?
you can even bring a ton of sprocs together; name them spMySproc;1
spMySproc;2 and spMySproc;3
and then you just need to
EXEC spMysproc and it fires all 3 of them.
MDB is for babies.
-Aaron
Smartin wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> > copy and paste and then you can design different pieces within a single
> > sproc-- in design view.
> >
> > MDB on STEROIDS. and I mean that in a positive way.. I personally love
> > steroids; and I think that they should be legal in all the sports
> > leagues.
> >
> > -Aaron
> > ADP nationalist
> >
> >
> > Smartin wrote:
> >> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> >>> if you were using Access Data Projects; you could write a single stored
> >>> procedure to fire 7 different appends.
> >>>
> >>> File that away under 'YET ANOTHER REASON ADP SLAUGHTERS MDB'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Aaron
> >>> ADP Nationalist
> >> But you would have to actually write "7 different appends" first, right?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Smartin
> >
>
> I don't understand where the efficiency part is. "Design different
> pieces"? Isn't that a lot like copy/pasting several appends and
> "tweaking" each one? Seems like it's all editing "TABLEX", "TABLEY",
> "TABLEZ" stuff in the end? Or do I miss the point?
>
> --
> Smartin