This is a field that it pays to be paranoid in, but in this case, I think
the operative word in that sentence is "apparently." What is "apparent" to
us changes over time. I don't think we yet have completely clear answer to
how Ray's machine became infected, but the virus in question infects via
Messenger, and via unprotected shares on a LAN. As I recall, in his case,
there wasn't a LAN involved so..... As I say--it isn't black and
white--he's got a sequence of events that would seem to indict Microsoft
antispyware. However--what's the mechanism that could be involved for a
single downloader (out of many more than 3,000,000 to be infected?
There are multiple threads with Ray on this issue, and more information in
the other thread, whose location I can't recall--perhaps general.
--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
"Rob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is the phrase;
> "....the Virus *distrubited [sic] by the MS SpyWare* ...."
> really true?
> i.e. surely it wasn't "distributed" by MS, or am I just paranoid!
>
> --
> Regards;
> Rob
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "Ray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:0b4701c50f16$06189a60$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Apparently I am a victim of the Virus distrubited by the
>> > MS SpyWare I installed over last weekend. I uninstaled
>
>