I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if anyone had
tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is running fine and I know "if
it ain't broke, blah blah blah".

Anyway, is anyone using it?

TIA,
clif

seems fine; not running any SATA or RAID at this time.
"Clif" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:S5edneuNhccRiMnfRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if anyone had
> tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is running fine and I know
> "if
> it ain't broke, blah blah blah".
>
> Anyway, is anyone using it?
>
> TIA,
> clif
>
>

no_one wrote:
> seems fine; not running any SATA or RAID at this time.
> "Clif" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:S5edneuNhccRiMnfRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if anyone had
>>tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is running fine and I know
>>"if
>>it ain't broke, blah blah blah".
>>
>>Anyway, is anyone using it?
>>
>>TIA,
>>clif
>>
>>
>
>
>
No problems here...
NBK

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:59:57 -0400, "Clif" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if
> anyone had tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is
> running fine and I know "if it ain't broke, blah blah blah".

The same here. I'm using the original 1016 in my P4C800-E Deluxe
but are planning to update to a late and good working BIOS version.
I don't like to try any betas or unstable BIOS.

Ken wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:59:57 -0400, "Clif" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if
>>anyone had tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is
>>running fine and I know "if it ain't broke, blah blah blah".
>
>
> The same here. I'm using the original 1016 in my P4C800-E Deluxe
> but are planning to update to a late and good working BIOS version.
> I don't like to try any betas or unstable BIOS.
>

Works just fine for me.
Frank

Ok, it went fine and I'm running S-ata Raid 0 on the Intel and the promise.
It's working fine ,but then I've been running the 1018 for a few months with
no problems and I never got the slow boot problem that some people did.

I just couldn't talk myself out of upgrading though. I kept telling myself
that everything is working fine so leave it alone and I'm running around 450
gb of drive space. Maybe with the new bios it's a nanosecond faster. Ya
think?

{;-) clif

I've been using it for 3 months with no problems - Raid 0 setup

Thanks every one for the response. Guess I'll go ahead and give it a try.
I'll let you know how it goes.

clif

On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:12:44 GMT, NBK <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>no_one wrote:
>> seems fine; not running any SATA or RAID at this time.
>> "Clif" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:S5edneuNhccRiMnfRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>>>I was going to do the update but thought I'd check and see if anyone had
>>>tried it yet. I have a P4C800-E Deluxe that is running fine and I know
>>>"if
>>>it ain't broke, blah blah blah".
>>>
>>>Anyway, is anyone using it?
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>clif
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>No problems here...
>NBK


Anyone using Acronis True Image Backup with the new 1021 bios? With
bios 1019 when using True Image recovery CD I have to manually input
"no acpi" or the boot will hang. I was hoping that 1021 would correct
the incompatible bios problem. My P4C800E Deluxe is the only computer
that I have to do that for. My laptop and all other computers that I
have (5) boot the recovery CD without manual intervention.