Same here. I have installed all versions of Vista under VirtualPC 2007, just
to jet a handle on the differences.
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
"Colin Barnhorst" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> There is no edition of VPC that officially supports Vista yet. Vista will
> be supported officially on VPC 2007 when it releases in a couple of
> months.
>
> As Richard says, VPC 2007 beta is your best bet. I would not use VPC 2004
> SP1. VPC 2007 beta virtual machine additions support Vista very nicely
> now.
>
> I have run all four editions of Vista x86 on VPC 2007 beta without
> incident. However, I have run MSDN licenses only. The EULAs for Home
> Basic and Home Premium do not permit using the retail licenses in a
> virtual machine.
>
> "Saucy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Are any of you running all the versions of Vista RTM?
>>
>> On two computers, I'm running:
>>
>> VU64
>> VU32
>> VBus32
>> VBasic32
>> Server200332
>>
>> I use Server 2003 as a base OS on one of them and ran bootpart. Now each
>> thinks it's on a primary partition [c:] and I can boot to any of them.
>>
>> I'm also wondering about virutal machines. Does Vista support Virtual PC
>> 2004 and does Virtual PC 2004 support Vista either "offically" or
>> "actuality" [e.g. although VPC2004 isn't offically support on Sever 2003,
>> it seems to run without issues]?
>>
>> I've (re)installed VistaU about four times now and VBus two or three
>> times and will be doing it again today. I already noticed one little
>> "bug" in the install routine last time and want to go through the install
>> process again.
>>
>> Thanks
>
|
Similar Threads
