I just ordered a 2300-D (duplex) this week, and am eagerly
awaiting it... it'll be my first laser-printer.

I'm finding it tough to find a review on it, though. Does anybody
here have one? Are they very good? Any problems?

- Tim

--

I have the HP 2200 and it is great. The only thing I had to do was add
memory.

P

"Spammay Blockay" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bqo879$cm8$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I just ordered a 2300-D (duplex) this week, and am eagerly
> awaiting it... it'll be my first laser-printer.
>
> I'm finding it tough to find a review on it, though. Does anybody
> here have one? Are they very good? Any problems?
>
> - Tim
>
> --
>

In article <4jOzb.303917$275.1043915@attbi_s53>,
Photo1v01 <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>I have the HP 2200 and it is great. The only thing I had to do was add
>memory.

What difference did adding memory make? Just more documents able
to be sent to it/stored on it at once? More fonts stored on it?

- Tim

--

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:16:31 GMT, (E-Mail Removed)
(Spammay Blockay) found these unused words floating about:

>In article <4jOzb.303917$275.1043915@attbi_s53>,
>Photo1v01 <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>I have the HP 2200 and it is great. The only thing I had to do was add
>>memory.
>
>What difference did adding memory make? Just more documents able
>to be sent to it/stored on it at once? More fonts stored on it?
>
>- Tim

With the 2100, more memory allowed more complex graphics to be printed
without error.

With a laser, you have to DL the entire 'image' before it's dumped to
the drum.

A legal sized B/W image at 1200 dpi is a big chunk!