Compare DSL vendors: AT&T, Qwest, Covad. (Supposedly Covad "owns" the
lines used by the other two, anyway?) At any rate, I need to know, (1)
What are the limits on email addresses per transmission: some ISPs
limit to as little as 30, to prevent professional spammers. (Our
garden group has 200 members, needs monthly newsletter.) (2) What is
the limit on an attachment size? (We'd sometimes like to send a photo
as large as 1.6M.) (3) How *much* vendor software does one have to
run? (E.g. We like *our* antivirus and don't want to run *their*
Norton.) (4) What about access on-the-road?

fjpoblam wrote:
> Compare DSL vendors: AT&T, Qwest, Covad. (Supposedly Covad "owns" the
> lines used by the other two, anyway?) At any rate, I need to know, (1)
> What are the limits on email addresses per transmission: some ISPs
> limit to as little as 30, to prevent professional spammers. (Our
> garden group has 200 members, needs monthly newsletter.) (2) What is
> the limit on an attachment size? (We'd sometimes like to send a photo
> as large as 1.6M.) (3) How *much* vendor software does one have to
> run? (E.g. We like *our* antivirus and don't want to run *their*
> Norton.) (4) What about access on-the-road?
>
http://www.broadbandreports.com/

--
Lem MS MVP -- Networking

To the moon and back with 64 Kbits of RAM and 512 Kbits of ROM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer

The following website has some good information on Broadband services
http://www.dslreports.com/


"fjpoblam" wrote:

> Compare DSL vendors: AT&T, Qwest, Covad. (Supposedly Covad "owns" the
> lines used by the other two, anyway?) At any rate, I need to know, (1)
> What are the limits on email addresses per transmission: some ISPs
> limit to as little as 30, to prevent professional spammers. (Our
> garden group has 200 members, needs monthly newsletter.) (2) What is
> the limit on an attachment size? (We'd sometimes like to send a photo
> as large as 1.6M.) (3) How *much* vendor software does one have to
> run? (E.g. We like *our* antivirus and don't want to run *their*
> Norton.) (4) What about access on-the-road?
>
>