Hi Mark,
This is just one of the 6800GS cards I'm considering:
BFG 6800GS Core = 370MHz (excellent possibility of clocking to 400+)
Memory = 1050MHz (Should clock to 1200+)
Bandwidth = 33.6 GB/s
Dual RamDac 400MHz
9800Pro (My Card) 6800GS 7800GS
3DMark 03 5783 10,000 11,400
3DMark 05 2695 4321 5393
3DMark 06 680 1900+? 2717
The 6800 & 7800GS mark are from Guru of 3D and they are about the same as
other sites I've checked. BTW, My 9800 PRO/128 memory speed is 338MHz.
Hmm - Although the 6800GS would be a significant improvement, it looks as
though I'm going to spend the extra $100 and go for the *7800GS* @$299

That should hold me comfortably for at least a year. Then I'll do a
complete upgrade - PCIX MB, CPU, DDR2 RAM, PCIX Vid card. All the rest of
my stuff is OK to start with after that I'll be able to upgrade
incrementally. Thanks for leading me to more research ;-)
"Mark C." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:SJbLf.2633$(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Ed Forsythe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bPadndEzOc32t2DeRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Not nearly as misleading as "...NVIDIA 6800 is a POS." I'll soon be
>> upgrading my 9800PRO to a 6800 or 7800GS because everything I have read
>> indicates either will be a huge improvement. The 9800PRO was a great
>> card
>> but it's a bit long in the tooth and it surely can't run close to either
>> of
>> the nVidia cards. However, it is possible that all the tests,
>> benchmarks,
>> etc. I have accessed have been mistaken. You may save me from an
>> expensive
>> mistake if you would post some of the info upon which you base your
>> opinion.
>
> The peak bandwidth of a stock 6800 (not GT/Ultra/GS, which is the
> card the OP was talking about) is 22.4GB/s, while the 9800 Pro's is
> 21.8GB/s.
>
> The 9800 Pro has a much faster core (380MHz vs. 325) and only
> slightly slower memory (680MHz vs. 700).
>
> The 6800 does have 12 pixel pipelines instead of the 9800's 8, which
> accounts for its better pixel fillrate. Still, someone upgrading from one
> to the other probably wouldn't see enough difference to justify the cost
> of a 6800.
>
>> "Mark C." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:nVWKf.1703$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > "johns" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> I'm building a new game box, and looking for a nice upgrade
>> >> video card. The box will be based on the AMD 64 Athlon 3800+
>> >> and pci-e video card. Over Christmas I bought one video card,
>> >> and tested another I had at work ... both were nVidia 6800s.
>> >> I proved to myself that the nVidia 6800 is a POS, and that
>> >> is all there is too it. I returned the one I bought and paid a
>> >> $55 restocking fee ( it was an XFX 6800, and it was a royal
>> >> piece of crap ). The "other" one was made by eVGA, and
>> >> it was only a little bit better. My 9800 Pro beat the tar out
>> >> of both cards. So, I wonder, before I guess at which card
>> >> to try next ... or be overwhelmed by all the lies and hype
>> >> from people who have bought these junkers ... is there
>> >> a vendor who will let me get in a couple of cards and test
>> >> them before I buy one? If not, does anybody know of an
>> >> honest video card reviewer ? So far all of the web sites
>> >> I've checked hedge their comments to mislead the buyer.
>> >> One of the worst being Tom's Hardware.
>> >
>> > The 9800 Pro is no slouch of a card. To see great improvement
>> > you'd need to upgrade to an X800 at a minimum, or preferably
>> > an X850/X1800/X1900 etc.
>> >
>> > I can't say I agree with your assessment of Nvidia's 6800's though.
>> > It just wasn't the proper upgrade for you, coming from an already
>> > great card. I guarantee you'd feel differently about Nvidia if you
>> > tried a 7800GT :-)
>> >
>> > Also, I agree with you 100% about Tom's Hardware. He and his
>> > staff push whatever company is buying them the most free lunches
>> > and product, so much of what's on his site is very misleading.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>