On Sun, 9 May 2004 08:26:04 -0700, "Ronnie Vernon MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>GuriaTru wrote:
>> The same "some" who fail at reading subject lines , maybe?
>> [rhetorical]
>>
>
>> You guys must be as thick as ticks on a bulls rump !
>> I should have known better than to offer such a post in a NG headed up
>> by <microshite.xxx.xxx.xxx>, but Hey ! I am flexible - forgive *m e*
>> :-/
>>
>> Right back at ya Buddy:
>> http://debianplanet.org/
>> Try something new ?
>>
>>
>>
>> GT
>
>You posted here to get the exact response that you received. Why would you
>be surprised?
>
READ "customise" and rethink your observation Buddy.

>You are apparently having a problem with that program you are trying to use.
>Do they offer tech support or have their own newsgroups/forums or did your
>original post hint that you are using an illegal version?
>
Thats a hell of a fishing line full of gang hooks U r trailing there
Buddy. Find your own solutions/answers. I am *not* working for you.

>Haven't tried Debian, but I have a partition with RH Linux v9 that hasn't
>really impressed me yet.
>
Why am I not surprised? RH is exactly the spawn of like minded persons
who sit in NGs as this one. Picking their snot , rolling it into little
balls and flicking the projectile at unwary passers by.
Your type will never be impressed or improved.

Live with it.

Its been fun folks,, but I really MUST leave you to your dwaddlings.
Another group that follows a similar genre gets 150 posts in 12hrs.
You guys manage a whole 35. That must tell you something.

I am outa here.

*_p00f_*

GT



--

Dr Zeus
-------------------------------
*did* I tell a lie?

Some old Hoary Goat of A Seppo

On Sun, 9 May 2004 12:29:47 -0500, Sharon F <(E-Mail Removed)>
blessed Deja with these pearls of flagellation:

>On Sun, 09 May 2004 10:24:43 GMT, GuriaTru wrote:
>
>> its Ver2505 from memory
>
>This was a release candidate version of XP. The older it gets, the more
>problems you are likely to encounter. Many system files will remain at
>older versions that current software may not work well with.
>
...that is simply not correct Sharon, bordering on mischievous
maliciousness even.
Many know *exactly* what 2505 is, many more have/do use the GUI
quite successfully.
Your statement is more of a promotion of - "upgrade"' "upgrade"
"upgrade" - than of any real worth to an observer.
But then that would be "par for the course in here <m.p.w.c>, right?
[rhetorical]
Just who did come up with the smartarse idea of placing "customise" in
a hierarchy of MS/pub groups,, its some sort of sick joke, yeh?
[rhetorical]
My need was to interface the GUI with a real OS, *that* is why my post
went up.
XPLite offers the opportunity to reduce this 'Bloatware' to a footprint
that is manageable, very easily. No doubt I could achieve the same thing
with work Why reinvent the wheel, something you MicroShite believers are
quite adept at promoting and That is about the limit of your skills.
The digital equivalent of Cut and Paste Kindergarten Kops.

http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html

Enjoy your day job and never leave it !:-D

GT


--

Dr Zeus
-------------------------------
*did* I tell a lie?

Some old Hoary Goat of A Seppo

Hi GT,

XPLite WORKS on legit versions of XP and is a fantastic program.
Your problems are being caused by the fact that you are using a copy of XP
that expired years ago. ALL activations of 2505 are blocked.
2505 was the RC 1 candidate for Windows XP that was released to the public
as a preview with a 180 day license for it's use. The fact that people have
cracked it and continued using it illegally is something between those
people and their conscience. Just don't expect to post your problems to MS
operated newsgroups and not be ridiculed for your stupidity,

To top that off you clearly stated that you tried using a bootleg copy of
XPLite as well--no wonder you are afraid to contact their customer support
<G>


--
Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User)
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm


"GuriaTru" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 9 May 2004 12:29:47 -0500, Sharon F <(E-Mail Removed)>
> blessed Deja with these pearls of flagellation:
>
>>On Sun, 09 May 2004 10:24:43 GMT, GuriaTru wrote:
>>
>>> its Ver2505 from memory
>>
>>This was a release candidate version of XP. The older it gets, the more
>>problems you are likely to encounter. Many system files will remain at
>>older versions that current software may not work well with.
>>
> ..that is simply not correct Sharon, bordering on mischievous
> maliciousness even.
> Many know *exactly* what 2505 is, many more have/do use the GUI
> quite successfully.
> Your statement is more of a promotion of - "upgrade"' "upgrade"
> "upgrade" - than of any real worth to an observer.
> But then that would be "par for the course in here <m.p.w.c>, right?
> [rhetorical]
> Just who did come up with the smartarse idea of placing "customise" in
> a hierarchy of MS/pub groups,, its some sort of sick joke, yeh?
> [rhetorical]
> My need was to interface the GUI with a real OS, *that* is why my post
> went up.
> XPLite offers the opportunity to reduce this 'Bloatware' to a footprint
> that is manageable, very easily. No doubt I could achieve the same thing
> with work Why reinvent the wheel, something you MicroShite believers are
> quite adept at promoting and That is about the limit of your skills.
> The digital equivalent of Cut and Paste Kindergarten Kops.
>
> http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html
>
> Enjoy your day job and never leave it !:-D
>
> GT
>
>
> --
>
> Dr Zeus
> -------------------------------
> *did* I tell a lie?
>
> Some old Hoary Goat of A Seppo

On Sun, 09 May 2004 22:42:23 GMT, GuriaTru wrote:

> ..that is simply not correct Sharon, bordering on mischievous
> maliciousness even.

You seem to have all the answers so you figure it out on your own. I use
several third party customizing programs with a valid and current XP and
have no trouble running any of them.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows XP Shell/User

Thank you, Larry. Great posting.

--

Will Denny
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User


"Larry Samuels" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
| Hi GT,
|
| XPLite WORKS on legit versions of XP and is a fantastic program.
| Your problems are being caused by the fact that you are using a copy of XP
| that expired years ago. ALL activations of 2505 are blocked.
| 2505 was the RC 1 candidate for Windows XP that was released to the public
| as a preview with a 180 day license for it's use. The fact that people
have
| cracked it and continued using it illegally is something between those
| people and their conscience. Just don't expect to post your problems to MS
| operated newsgroups and not be ridiculed for your stupidity,
|
| To top that off you clearly stated that you tried using a bootleg copy of
| XPLite as well--no wonder you are afraid to contact their customer support
| <G>
|
|
| --
| Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User)
| Associate Expert
| Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
| Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
| http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm
|
|
| "GuriaTru" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
| news:(E-Mail Removed)...
| > On Sun, 9 May 2004 12:29:47 -0500, Sharon F <(E-Mail Removed)>
| > blessed Deja with these pearls of flagellation:
| >
| >>On Sun, 09 May 2004 10:24:43 GMT, GuriaTru wrote:
| >>
| >>> its Ver2505 from memory
| >>
| >>This was a release candidate version of XP. The older it gets, the more
| >>problems you are likely to encounter. Many system files will remain at
| >>older versions that current software may not work well with.
| >>
| > ..that is simply not correct Sharon, bordering on mischievous
| > maliciousness even.
| > Many know *exactly* what 2505 is, many more have/do use the GUI
| > quite successfully.
| > Your statement is more of a promotion of - "upgrade"' "upgrade"
| > "upgrade" - than of any real worth to an observer.
| > But then that would be "par for the course in here <m.p.w.c>, right?
| > [rhetorical]
| > Just who did come up with the smartarse idea of placing "customise" in
| > a hierarchy of MS/pub groups,, its some sort of sick joke, yeh?
| > [rhetorical]
| > My need was to interface the GUI with a real OS, *that* is why my post
| > went up.
| > XPLite offers the opportunity to reduce this 'Bloatware' to a footprint
| > that is manageable, very easily. No doubt I could achieve the same thing
| > with work Why reinvent the wheel, something you MicroShite believers are
| > quite adept at promoting and That is about the limit of your skills.
| > The digital equivalent of Cut and Paste Kindergarten Kops.
| >
| > http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html
| >
| > Enjoy your day job and never leave it !:-D
| >
| > GT
| >
| >
| > --
| >
| > Dr Zeus
| > -------------------------------
| > *did* I tell a lie?
| >
| > Some old Hoary Goat of A Seppo
|
|

On Sun, 9 May 2004 19:05:54 -0400, Larry Samuels wrote:

> XPLite WORKS on legit versions of XP and is a fantastic program.
> Your problems are being caused by the fact that you are using a copy of XP
> that expired years ago. ALL activations of 2505 are blocked.
> 2505 was the RC 1 candidate for Windows XP that was released to the public
> as a preview with a 180 day license for it's use. The fact that people have
> cracked it and continued using it illegally is something between those
> people and their conscience. Just don't expect to post your problems to MS
> operated newsgroups and not be ridiculed for your stupidity,

All good points, Larry. For the record, I really wasn't trying to pass
judgment one way or the other about the version of XP being used. Rather
the point I was trying to make is that current software, especially a shell
replacement, is tuned to work with existing operating systems and their
supported file versions.

--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows XP Shell/User