Shenan,
Thanks, that article is very helpful. At its end there's another article
explaining the tradeoffs using dynamic disks, which is always very useful to
know. Based on that, I'll leave my 2 TB eSATA as a dynamic disk (which is how
I was formatting it anyway) and leave my C: drive as a basic disk. I might
add another eSATA and do a RAID-1 across both RAID-0 eSATA's but my basic C:
drive doesn't seem to be broken so no need to fix it
Thanks again,
Robert
"Shenan Stanley" wrote:
> GettingByOk wrote:
> > I'm formatting a 2 TB RAID-0 volume right now as a dynamic disk.
> > It's a 2-drive RAID-0 set and it's my L: disk. My C: drive is also
> > RAID-0 but it's a Basic disk. Two questions:
> >
> > 1) Any drawbacks to Dynamic disks? Couldn't find any in the doc
> > except for the same kind as with NTFS, you can't do certain things
> > w/ older OS's that I don't need to do anyway.
> >
> > 2) Any significant risks or problems if I convert my C: drive from
> > Basic to Dynamic?
>
> Actually - I would ask myself this question, "What do *I* gain by using a
> dynamic disk over a basic disk in my configuration...?" --> So - if you
> asked yourself that - what is your answer? ;-)
>
> Assuming you have read this?
> http://www.dynamic-disk.com/differen...amic-disk.html
>
> --
> Shenan Stanley
> MS-MVP
> --
> How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
>
> .
>