Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers out
there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
Anything else?

(E-Mail Removed), 6/27/2005, 4:05:36 PM, wrote:

> Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers out
> there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
> Anything else?

K9
http://keir.net/k9.html

--
No matter what happens someone will find a way to take it too seriously.

"badgolferman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> (E-Mail Removed), 6/27/2005, 4:05:36 PM, wrote:
>
>> Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers out
>> there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
>> Anything else?
>
> K9
> http://keir.net/k9.html
>

K9 is brilliant. I have been using it for around 2 years, and currently
see about 2 spams per month now. Be aware that K9 needs to learn what YOU
find acceptable and will not be instantly successful.

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

Thanks!!! I wish I had waited for your response before purchasing
CoffeCup's SpamBlocker. K9 is so much better!

On 27 Jun 2005 20:21:41 GMT, "badgolferman"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>(E-Mail Removed), 6/27/2005, 4:05:36 PM, wrote:
>
>> Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers out
>> there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
>> Anything else?
>
>K9
>http://keir.net/k9.html

(E-Mail Removed), 6/29/2005, 9:54:08 PM, wrote:

> Thanks!!! I wish I had waited for your response before purchasing
> CoffeCup's SpamBlocker. K9 is so much better!

Well, I responded to you within 15 minutes. You are an impatient
fellow, aren't you?!

You will have to train it. After a couple of years the accuracy rate
of mine is 99.81% and that's lower than it has been.

--
No matter what happens someone will find a way to take it too seriously.

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Thanks!!! I wish I had waited for your response before purchasing
> CoffeCup's SpamBlocker. K9 is so much better!

I thought CoffeeCup stuff had spyware imbedded-or was the imbedded stuff
just in their zip program?



>
> On 27 Jun 2005 20:21:41 GMT, "badgolferman"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> (E-Mail Removed), 6/27/2005, 4:05:36 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers
>>> out there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
>>> Anything else?
>>
>> K9
>> http://keir.net/k9.html

--

Their ethics are a short summary of police ordinances: for them the
most important thing is to be a useful member of the state, and to air
their opinions in the club of an evening; they have never felt the
homesickness for something unknown and far away, nor the depths which
consists in being nothing at all. ___________Soren Kierkegaard

Ellis_jay

No - I use a lot of coffee cup products and there's no Spyware.

On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 07:44:03 -0500, "ellis_jay"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>> Thanks!!! I wish I had waited for your response before purchasing
>> CoffeCup's SpamBlocker. K9 is so much better!
>
>I thought CoffeeCup stuff had spyware imbedded-or was the imbedded stuff
>just in their zip program?
>
>
>
>>
>> On 27 Jun 2005 20:21:41 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> (E-Mail Removed), 6/27/2005, 4:05:36 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like the subject says, are there any decent freeware spam blockers
>>>> out there? I tried installing spambayes, but it gave me an error.
>>>> Anything else?
>>>
>>> K9
>>> http://keir.net/k9.html

Yes...I am! <grin> I got it before I had checked for new usenet
messages.
On 30 Jun 2005 02:28:28 GMT, "badgolferman"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>(E-Mail Removed), 6/29/2005, 9:54:08 PM, wrote:
>
>> Thanks!!! I wish I had waited for your response before purchasing
>> CoffeCup's SpamBlocker. K9 is so much better!
>
>Well, I responded to you within 15 minutes. You are an impatient
>fellow, aren't you?!
>
>You will have to train it. After a couple of years the accuracy rate
>of mine is 99.81% and that's lower than it has been.