glinch,
Please don't post the same question separately to two newsgroups. What
responders
answer in one group is not seen by others in the other group/s, which can
get very confusing,
and waste responder's time.
It's no big deal... but should be avoided it in the future.
If you must to "multi-post", make sure you put the TO multiple
newsgroups on
the one post.
Ex. = (microsoft.public.access.forms ;
microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)
That way, responses in Forms are also seen in GettingStarted.
Thanks,
--
hth
Al Campagna
Microsoft Access MVP 2007-2009
http://home.comcast.net/~cccsolutions/index.html
"Find a job that you love... and you'll never work a day in your life."
"glinch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:94192403-B94F-44C4-A399-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi there, hopefully somebody will be able to offer me some words of
> advice.
>
> I am creating a database for a firm that deals with property insurance
> claims. Creating a databse of relevant contacts etc ... is not a problem.
>
> The current system that the company uses is that of an excel spreadsheet,
> where the details for each room are recorded and relatively simple
> calculations are carried out on this.
>
> The details needed for each room are the same (ie height, width, damage
> floor etc ...), the variation being for each claim being how many rooms.
>
> My intention is to move the system completely over to access, and avoid
> attaching spreadsheets to records etc...
>
> Ideally I would like to be able to creat a form where the user would
> select
> the number of rooms (e.g 1 sittingroom, 2 bathrooms, 3 bedrooms) and the
> form
> would then on the following stage request the relevant data eg
>
> Sitting room:
> height, width, etc..
>
> bathroom1:
> height, width, etc..
>
> bathroom2:
> height, width, etc..
>
> bedroom1:
> height, width, etc..
>
> bedroom2:
> height, width, etc..
>
> bedroom3:
> height, width, etc..
>
>
> Is it possible to do this dynamically so to speak?
>
> Would any one have any recommendations? Should I go down this route or
> stick
> to the old system?