So, my trial period for NOD32 is finally up.
Am I impressed? quite frankly yes and no.
Sure, it caught a few things but with my previous pritection, I didn't
suffer any attacks.
My system seems faster with it enabled and I don't get internet connectivity
problems.
At 25 Euros/machine, it would cost quite a bit to get protection for all 3
of my machines - especially when two of them aren't used for making money.
Particular gripes really concern the way that the reporting doesn't state
whether exploit.can.2003-0533 was cleaned/quarantined or deleted... left me
feeling naked there for a while - especially as it didn't report/display any
warnings,
Still, I quite like it. It's a tad complicated to set up all the profiles
for deep scanning of all files but there are some reassuring options there.
I think I'm best off buying a single 2 year license for my main machine
which I really need paid for protection on and using avg on my hobby
machines.
Your thoughts gents?
cb

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:04:07 +0200, "Chris Berry"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>So, my trial period for NOD32 is finally up.
>Am I impressed? quite frankly yes and no.
>Sure, it caught a few things but with my previous pritection, I didn't
>suffer any attacks.
>My system seems faster with it enabled and I don't get internet connectivity
>problems.
>At 25 Euros/machine, it would cost quite a bit to get protection for all 3
>of my machines - especially when two of them aren't used for making money.
>Particular gripes really concern the way that the reporting doesn't state
>whether exploit.can.2003-0533 was cleaned/quarantined or deleted... left me
>feeling naked there for a while - especially as it didn't report/display any
>warnings,
>Still, I quite like it. It's a tad complicated to set up all the profiles
>for deep scanning of all files but there are some reassuring options there.
>I think I'm best off buying a single 2 year license for my main machine
>which I really need paid for protection on and using avg on my hobby
>machines.
>Your thoughts gents?
>cb
>
Beta is supposed to be out this week.

"Chris Berry" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:ccv5ab$n8l$07$(E-Mail Removed):

> So, my trial period for NOD32 is finally up.
> Am I impressed? quite frankly yes and no.
> Sure, it caught a few things but with my previous pritection, I didn't
> suffer any attacks.
> My system seems faster with it enabled and I don't get internet
> connectivity problems.
> At 25 Euros/machine, it would cost quite a bit to get protection for
> all 3 of my machines - especially when two of them aren't used for
> making money. Particular gripes really concern the way that the
> reporting doesn't state whether exploit.can.2003-0533 was
> cleaned/quarantined or deleted... left me feeling naked there for a
> while - especially as it didn't report/display any warnings,
> Still, I quite like it. It's a tad complicated to set up all the
> profiles for deep scanning of all files but there are some reassuring
> options there. I think I'm best off buying a single 2 year license for
> my main machine which I really need paid for protection on and using
> avg on my hobby machines.
> Your thoughts gents?
> cb
>
>

If you're a complete honest Joe, then you can put it on on machine and be
done with it. On the other hand, you can............... do that too.

Duane

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:38:28 GMT, Duane Arnold <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>"Chris Berry" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:ccv5ab$n8l$07$(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> So, my trial period for NOD32 is finally up.
>> Am I impressed? quite frankly yes and no.
>> Sure, it caught a few things but with my previous pritection, I didn't
>> suffer any attacks.
>> My system seems faster with it enabled and I don't get internet
>> connectivity problems.
>> At 25 Euros/machine, it would cost quite a bit to get protection for
>> all 3 of my machines - especially when two of them aren't used for
>> making money. Particular gripes really concern the way that the
>> reporting doesn't state whether exploit.can.2003-0533 was
>> cleaned/quarantined or deleted... left me feeling naked there for a
>> while - especially as it didn't report/display any warnings,
>> Still, I quite like it. It's a tad complicated to set up all the
>> profiles for deep scanning of all files but there are some reassuring
>> options there. I think I'm best off buying a single 2 year license for
>> my main machine which I really need paid for protection on and using
>> avg on my hobby machines.
>> Your thoughts gents?
>> cb
>>
>>
>
>If you're a complete honest Joe, then you can put it on on machine and be
>done with it. On the other hand, you can............... do that too.
>
>Duane

It really needs a person with high morale to buy 2 license for 2 home
machines. They could sell some kind of home licence, which could be
used in all machines in same household.

Jari

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:21:49 -0500, Spock <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:


> Beta is supposed to be out this week.
Beta what? Nod32 v.3?

Jari

Doesn't Norton allow one to install on two machines with a single licensed
version? Eset could do the same.

Duane

In article <Xns9525410A5D977notmenotmecom@204.127.204.17>, Duane Arnold
says...
>
> Doesn't Norton allow one to install on two machines with a single licensed
> version? Eset could do the same.
>
Eset doesn't have a limit.


--
Conor

Dumb as a box of rocks...

I have problem to scan some archiver file ex. rar and cab with
special compress option. Maybe RAR has many versions.

It couldn't extract them .





On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:04:07 +0200, "Chris Berry"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>So, my trial period for NOD32 is finally up.
>Am I impressed? quite frankly yes and no.
>Sure, it caught a few things but with my previous pritection, I didn't
>suffer any attacks.
>My system seems faster with it enabled and I don't get internet connectivity
>problems.
>At 25 Euros/machine, it would cost quite a bit to get protection for all 3
>of my machines - especially when two of them aren't used for making money.
>Particular gripes really concern the way that the reporting doesn't state
>whether exploit.can.2003-0533 was cleaned/quarantined or deleted... left me
>feeling naked there for a while - especially as it didn't report/display any
>warnings,
>Still, I quite like it. It's a tad complicated to set up all the profiles
>for deep scanning of all files but there are some reassuring options there.
>I think I'm best off buying a single 2 year license for my main machine
>which I really need paid for protection on and using avg on my hobby
>machines.
>Your thoughts gents?
>cb
>

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:04:51 +0700, Fullname <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I have problem to scan some archiver file ex. rar and cab with
>special compress option. Maybe RAR has many versions.
>
>It couldn't extract them .
>
>
Do you have some kind of beta version? Normal version does not scan
inside rar-files?
Jari

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:03:38 +0300, Jari Lehtonen
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:04:51 +0700, Fullname <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>I have problem to scan some archiver file ex. rar and cab with
>>special compress option. Maybe RAR has many versions.
>>
>>It couldn't extract them .
>>
>>
>Do you have some kind of beta version? Normal version does not scan
>inside rar-files?
>Jari



It does scan inside RAR files, but some RAR files it couldn't extract
them..

I known that RAR has many versions and compression schemes.