even after changing the settings for scanning ( deep
scanning files and folders, and selecting the cookies
folder) microsoft antispyware does not scan for cookies.
Now i still have to use another program to dectect bad
cookies.

"nlm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1d9401c4fc16$c8a9fc80$(E-Mail Removed)...
> even after changing the settings for scanning ( deep
> scanning files and folders, and selecting the cookies
> folder) microsoft antispyware does not scan for cookies.
> Now i still have to use another program to dectect bad
> cookies.

Note the "beta1." This means that this tool is not currently meant to be a
replacement for your current tools, it is a beta program that you are
supposed to test. Cookie scanning is not yet supported, however, it will be
supported at a later time.

Hi nlm,
This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor intended for use in production
machines...does NOT go into the cookie jar.

Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP

"nlm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1d9401c4fc16$c8a9fc80$(E-Mail Removed)...
> even after changing the settings for scanning ( deep
> scanning files and folders, and selecting the cookies
> folder) microsoft antispyware does not scan for cookies.
> Now i still have to use another program to dectect bad
> cookies.
>

Ron Chamberlin wrote:
> Hi nlm,
> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor intended for use in production
> machines...does NOT go into the cookie jar.

So you're saying the final version will?

--
Thanks,

Martijn Saly

I don't think we know that answer, but the product it is based on did, and
the counters and user interface are still there. My guess is that it will,
but nobody except a Microsoft staff person can say for certain about this
kind of issue. (actually, you'd probably read the answer first from a
journalist source--Paul Thurrot, for example.)

"Martijn Saly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%23gkfprM$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ron Chamberlin wrote:
>> Hi nlm,
>> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor intended for use in
>> production machines...does NOT go into the cookie jar.
>
> So you're saying the final version will?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Martijn Saly

Hi Martijn,

I'm neither saying it will or it won't, as I haven't the answer. It surely
is a feature that I think we would all like to see tho.

Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP

"Martijn Saly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%23gkfprM$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ron Chamberlin wrote:
>> Hi nlm,
>> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor intended for use in
>> production machines...does NOT go into the cookie jar.
>
> So you're saying the final version will?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Martijn Saly
>

FWIW, two items from the responses in the Security 360 webcast:

1) there will be another beta release
2) Enabling cookie scanning and removal is under consideration for that
release.

"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uNJ9rse$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Martijn,
>
> I'm neither saying it will or it won't, as I haven't the answer. It surely
> is a feature that I think we would all like to see tho.
>
> Ron Chamberlin
> MS-MVP
>
> "Martijn Saly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%23gkfprM$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Ron Chamberlin wrote:
>>> Hi nlm,
>>> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor intended for use in
>>> production machines...does NOT go into the cookie jar.
>>
>> So you're saying the final version will?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Martijn Saly
>>
>
>
>

I can't activate the Internet Security Agent. Is this a
problem with the Beta version or is it just something
that is screwed up with my install?


>-----Original Message-----
>FWIW, two items from the responses in the Security 360
webcast:
>
>1) there will be another beta release
>2) Enabling cookie scanning and removal is under
consideration for that
>release.
>
>"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>news:uNJ9rse$(E-Mail Removed).
com...
>> Hi Martijn,
>>
>> I'm neither saying it will or it won't, as I haven't
the answer. It surely
>> is a feature that I think we would all like to see tho.
>>
>> Ron Chamberlin
>> MS-MVP
>>
>> "Martijn Saly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:%
23gkfprM$(E-Mail Removed)..
..
>>> Ron Chamberlin wrote:
>>>> Hi nlm,
>>>> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor
intended for use in
>>>> production machines...does NOT go into the cookie
jar.
>>>
>>> So you're saying the final version will?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Martijn Saly
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>

I think that some folks running some other security-related products--some
of the newer fancier Norton suites, for example, have reported that come of
the agents won't activate.

Does that match your circumstances?

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1a8e01c50032$f19e85f0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I can't activate the Internet Security Agent. Is this a
> problem with the Beta version or is it just something
> that is screwed up with my install?
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>FWIW, two items from the responses in the Security 360
> webcast:
>>
>>1) there will be another beta release
>>2) Enabling cookie scanning and removal is under
> consideration for that
>>release.
>>
>>"Ron Chamberlin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message
>>news:uNJ9rse$(E-Mail Removed).
> com...
>>> Hi Martijn,
>>>
>>> I'm neither saying it will or it won't, as I haven't
> the answer. It surely
>>> is a feature that I think we would all like to see tho.
>>>
>>> Ron Chamberlin
>>> MS-MVP
>>>
>>> "Martijn Saly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:%
> 23gkfprM$(E-Mail Removed)..
> .
>>>> Ron Chamberlin wrote:
>>>>> Hi nlm,
>>>>> This version of the Beta ..not complete, nor
> intended for use in
>>>>> production machines...does NOT go into the cookie
> jar.
>>>>
>>>> So you're saying the final version will?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Martijn Saly
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>