I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.

Thanks,
~alan

"~~Alan~~" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> ~alan
>
>

I have never worked on a machine with Sophos

but have had to repair many machines with both Norton and Mcaffee.

Even though the machines had updated virus definitions, they still got
infected.
The unfortunate fact is that the "wonderful" folks who write the malware,
seem to enjoy most...attacking the "big name" virus checkers.

Additionally, Norton and Mcaffee are some of the biggest resource hogs out
there.

If you need to run a virus checker on your own home machine,
you'd be better off with the free version of Avast or AVG

~~Alan~~ wrote:
> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> ~alan
>
>

From the IT dept's point of view, such apps permit centralized control,
which at least means that IT can ensure that users are up-to-date both
with respect to virus definitions and application revisions. McAfee, and
I believe Symantec as well, also can be installed so that the client has
no access to the "control panel," and thus can't reconfigure how the a/v
behaves. This can be a problem if the client wants to temporarily
disable a/v scanning in order, for example, to install some app or
update. But then again, IT probably doesn't want clients installing
their own apps.

As far as resource hogging, Symantec a/v Corp Ed. may be a little better
than consumer Norton a/v, but its startup scan can be a real PITA.

--
Lem -- MS-MVP

To the moon and back with 2K words of RAM and 36K words of ROM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer
http://history.nasa.gov/afj/compessay.htm

On Oct 8, 11:41*am, "~~Alan~~" <a.she...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> ~alan

Sophos -- I used it years ago. It was fast in scanning and shielding
but at the time, they were not able to remove the viruses. They
recommneded to delete all infected files and restore from backup.

McAfee -- Very slow. Let viruses thru sometimes

Norton -- Not a business grade anti-virus. Symantec Corporate
edition.
Also slow.

AVG for networks, mostly. We disable the link scanner and email scanning, as
we user server-based mail scanning. One advantage is that V8 detects spyware
as well as viruses, which most AV products do not. Does have some performance
impact, but good detection rate.

Sophos is good, have that on one supported site.

NOD32 (Eset) and Avira are also good for standalone use, not sure if they
support centralised updating, though.

Norton - useless.
McAfee - not much better.


"~~Alan~~" wrote:

> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> ~alan
>
>
>

Something I discovered recently, I had purchased KIS and been using it for
years, and THOUGHT I had Virus coverage as well, apparently not, as KIS
doesn't automatically include the Antivirus portion, and when I asked for
help to activate the Antivirus portion, from Kaspersky they have ignored me.

"~~Alan~~" wrote:

> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> ~alan
>
>
>

"EncinoMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:41:42 -0400, "~~Alan~~" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
>>about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
>>experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
>>from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>~alan
>>
> Why bring this up here? What A/V program you choose is just personal
> preference.
>
> Ask elsewhere

Darn you are funny! :-) some people just don't have anything else to do do
they????

"EncinoMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:41:42 -0400, "~~Alan~~" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
>>about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
>>experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
>>from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>~alan
>>
> Why bring this up here? What A/V program you choose is just personal
> preference.
>
> Ask elsewhere

Indeed, you should ask in a news group with *general* in the newsgroup name.

Since this is such a newsgroup a better plan would be to ignore our resident
****wit.

"EncinoMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:51:31 -0400, "George" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>
>>"EncinoMan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:41:42 -0400, "~~Alan~~" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
>>>>about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
>>>>experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus
>>>>solutions
>>>>from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>~alan
>>>>
>>> Why bring this up here? What A/V program you choose is just personal
>>> preference.
>>>
>>> Ask elsewhere
>>
>>Darn you are funny! :-) some people just don't have anything else to do
>>do
>>they????
>>
>
> You mean besides ask stupid off topic questions in groups they don't
> belong in? Then yes, I agree with you.

You are a fine one to talk. You have been spamming these newsgroups with
your repetitive ****wit posts for longer than anyone can remember.

I've gone from AVG to Avast - AVG wouldn't update and also 'try' to update
at a certain tiem each day.
"philo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "~~Alan~~" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I'm probably going to start some heated discussions (I may want to talk
>> about politics instead) but I'm interested to read about anyone's
>> experiences with enterprise (not stand-alone please) anti-virus solutions
>> from Norton, Sophos, Mcaffee, etc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~alan
>>
>>
>
> I have never worked on a machine with Sophos
>
> but have had to repair many machines with both Norton and Mcaffee.
>
> Even though the machines had updated virus definitions, they still got
> infected.
> The unfortunate fact is that the "wonderful" folks who write the malware,
> seem to enjoy most...attacking the "big name" virus checkers.
>
> Additionally, Norton and Mcaffee are some of the biggest resource hogs out
> there.
>
> If you need to run a virus checker on your own home machine,
> you'd be better off with the free version of Avast or AVG
>
>