ok, jim, thanks.
--
Gary
"Jim Thomlinson" <James_Thomlinson@owfg-Re-Move-This-.com> wrote in message
news:7EA65B45-03DB-4C64-B5F4-(E-Mail Removed)...
> If there is a difference it is so small as to not be noticable. Find is smart
> enough to only look in cells that have values. Oddly enough in most cases it
> would probably be slower to define the range to search as the time taken to
> define the range is probably longer than the extra work potentially done by
> the find... I have not tested this against a sheet where the used range gets
> messed up which as a guess would be the only place where find might be
> inefficient...
>
> In short leave your code as is (IMO)...
> --
> HTH...
>
> Jim Thomlinson
>
>
> "Gary Keramidas" wrote:
>
>> right now i am using this:
>> Set rngfound = ws4.Columns("B:B").Find
>>
>> just wondering, if it would be better to actually determine the exact range
>> in
>> column B rather than searching the entire column. most of the rows are going
>> to
>> be blank, anyway.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
|