"~BD~" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "N. Miller" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:29:48 -0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> "N. Miller" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:44u0zczro2p7$.(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:42:36 -0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> My thanks for your response, Norman.
>>>
>>> I now request a favour.
>>>
>>> I have recently posted a message to PABear which I will repeat/paste
>>> below. I now realise that as he has 'Killfiled' me ...
>>
>> And he has his reasons for doing so (assuming that he actually has).
>> Why
>> should I disturb him any more than I already do? Frankly, I am
>> surprised
>> that he hasn't killfiled me. But it would be rude of me to violate
>> his
>> wishes, don't you think?
>>
>> --
>> Norman
>> ~Shine, bright morning light,
>> ~now in the air the spring is coming.
>> ~Sweet, blowing wind,
>> ~singing down the hills and valleys.
>
>
>
> I confess that I am a little surprised by your answer, Norman.
>
> Your posts seem absolutely fine to me and I have never questioned your
> advice or motives. I cannot conceive a circumstance where PABear would
> wish to killfile *you*.
>
> Rude or not, I feel it only right and proper that *someone* should
> warn
> him of my intentions before I publish to the world that he has LIED -
> I
> know that, He knows that ......... and so does Robear Dyer.
>
> It is your prerogative to refuse my request, Norman. Maybe, just
> maybe,
> someone else will make sure the message gets through to him.
>
> Regardless, I'd like you to know that I value the help which you have
> given to me and I'm confident that many others appreciate your advice
> too. Thank you.
>
> Dave
>
>
|
Similar Threads
