Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the "Symantec
Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender anymore?

I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function for
security!
Thanks for an answer.

same problem with norton 2006 , i am running now defender as a on-demand
scanner and not using the real-time protection item waiting for a solution
from microsoft. please let it take no to long ....


Joris.

"mec" wrote:

> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the "Symantec
> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender anymore?
>
> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function for
> security!
> Thanks for an answer.

As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus protection
and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.

Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?

mec wrote:
>
> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the "Symantec
> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender anymore?
>
> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function for
> security!
> Thanks for an answer.

You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of some
Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way. Windows
Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.

--

"ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
> other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus protection
> and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
>
> Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
>
> mec wrote:
>>
>> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
>> "Symantec
>> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender
>> anymore?
>>
>> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function for
>> security!
>> Thanks for an answer.

hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
"msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the files
of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource protector"
so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....

but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
problems ?



"Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:

> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of some
> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way. Windows
> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
>
> --
>
> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus protection
> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
> >
> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
> >
> > mec wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
> >> "Symantec
> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender
> >> anymore?
> >>
> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function for
> >> security!
> >> Thanks for an answer.
>
>
>

Thanks for the clarification--it has been a while since the details were
posted, and I haven't seen it first hand.

I don't know that this behavior has changed. There have been two revisions
to the engine and none to the User Interface since the beta2 release, and I
don't recall hearing after the second engine rev whether folks still see
this issue.

We anticipate that there will be a UI revision issued at some point, and
that would be another time to test this interaction. However, I don't know
if this is something Microsoft alone can solve.

--

"joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:80B1E6F9-2E7C-4002-A830-(E-Mail Removed)...
> hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
> "msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the
> files
> of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource
> protector"
> so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
> so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....
>
> but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
> problems ?
>
>
>
> "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
>
>> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of
>> some
>> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way.
>> Windows
>> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
>>
>> --
>>
>> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >
>> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
>> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus protection
>> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
>> >
>> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
>> >
>> > mec wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
>> >> "Symantec
>> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender
>> >> anymore?
>> >>
>> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function
>> >> for
>> >> security!
>> >> Thanks for an answer.
>>
>>
>>

I can not find anywhere if leaving Norton and Defender both running with real
time protection and having this conflict will cause you to have a problem
with being protected, does anyone know? It does not seem to be causing me any
problem and I do not get any pop ups, the only way I know it is going on is
to look at the Norton Reports. So does allowing this conflict to go on hurt
anything, until they have a fix.
--
slybo


"Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification--it has been a while since the details were
> posted, and I haven't seen it first hand.
>
> I don't know that this behavior has changed. There have been two revisions
> to the engine and none to the User Interface since the beta2 release, and I
> don't recall hearing after the second engine rev whether folks still see
> this issue.
>
> We anticipate that there will be a UI revision issued at some point, and
> that would be another time to test this interaction. However, I don't know
> if this is something Microsoft alone can solve.
>
> --
>
> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:80B1E6F9-2E7C-4002-A830-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
> > "msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the
> > files
> > of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource
> > protector"
> > so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
> > so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....
> >
> > but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
> > problems ?
> >
> >
> >
> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
> >
> >> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of
> >> some
> >> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way.
> >> Windows
> >> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >
> >> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
> >> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus protection
> >> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
> >> >
> >> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
> >> >
> >> > mec wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
> >> >> "Symantec
> >> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with Defender
> >> >> anymore?
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV function
> >> >> for
> >> >> security!
> >> >> Thanks for an answer.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

You should have an antivirus, with real-time protection running along with
Windows Defender. I think you are fine--I don't believe these reports
indicate any problem with the protection provided by either product.

--

"slybo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:A34CFA38-C01E-4A5C-B3CE-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I can not find anywhere if leaving Norton and Defender both running with
>real
> time protection and having this conflict will cause you to have a problem
> with being protected, does anyone know? It does not seem to be causing me
> any
> problem and I do not get any pop ups, the only way I know it is going on
> is
> to look at the Norton Reports. So does allowing this conflict to go on
> hurt
> anything, until they have a fix.
> --
> slybo
>
>
> "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the clarification--it has been a while since the details were
>> posted, and I haven't seen it first hand.
>>
>> I don't know that this behavior has changed. There have been two
>> revisions
>> to the engine and none to the User Interface since the beta2 release, and
>> I
>> don't recall hearing after the second engine rev whether folks still see
>> this issue.
>>
>> We anticipate that there will be a UI revision issued at some point, and
>> that would be another time to test this interaction. However, I don't
>> know
>> if this is something Microsoft alone can solve.
>>
>> --
>>
>> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:80B1E6F9-2E7C-4002-A830-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
>> > "msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the
>> > files
>> > of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource
>> > protector"
>> > so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
>> > so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....
>> >
>> > but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
>> > problems ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
>> >
>> >> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of
>> >> some
>> >> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way.
>> >> Windows
>> >> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> >> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> >
>> >> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
>> >> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus
>> >> > protection
>> >> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
>> >> >
>> >> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
>> >> >
>> >> > mec wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
>> >> >> "Symantec
>> >> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with
>> >> >> Defender
>> >> >> anymore?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV
>> >> >> function
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> security!
>> >> >> Thanks for an answer.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>

Thank you so much for your reply. I will leave both running Norton and
Defender.
--
slybo


"Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:

> You should have an antivirus, with real-time protection running along with
> Windows Defender. I think you are fine--I don't believe these reports
> indicate any problem with the protection provided by either product.
>
> --
>
> "slybo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:A34CFA38-C01E-4A5C-B3CE-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I can not find anywhere if leaving Norton and Defender both running with
> >real
> > time protection and having this conflict will cause you to have a problem
> > with being protected, does anyone know? It does not seem to be causing me
> > any
> > problem and I do not get any pop ups, the only way I know it is going on
> > is
> > to look at the Norton Reports. So does allowing this conflict to go on
> > hurt
> > anything, until they have a fix.
> > --
> > slybo
> >
> >
> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the clarification--it has been a while since the details were
> >> posted, and I haven't seen it first hand.
> >>
> >> I don't know that this behavior has changed. There have been two
> >> revisions
> >> to the engine and none to the User Interface since the beta2 release, and
> >> I
> >> don't recall hearing after the second engine rev whether folks still see
> >> this issue.
> >>
> >> We anticipate that there will be a UI revision issued at some point, and
> >> that would be another time to test this interaction. However, I don't
> >> know
> >> if this is something Microsoft alone can solve.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:80B1E6F9-2E7C-4002-A830-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
> >> > "msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the
> >> > files
> >> > of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource
> >> > protector"
> >> > so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
> >> > so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....
> >> >
> >> > but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
> >> > problems ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of
> >> >> some
> >> >> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way.
> >> >> Windows
> >> >> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> >> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
> >> >> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus
> >> >> > protection
> >> >> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > mec wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
> >> >> >> "Symantec
> >> >> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with
> >> >> >> Defender
> >> >> >> anymore?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV
> >> >> >> function
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> security!
> >> >> >> Thanks for an answer.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Instead, i have a problem.
If "Symantec Resource Protector" has turned on, besides the appearance of
the logs of access not authorized, as soon as windows has started, the icon
tray of Norton Antivirus immediately appears with a red cross (the real time
protection isn't active); then, only after some minutes, everything returns
normal and Norton becomes active.
So, during this time, I can use the pc, but without an antivirus protection.

"Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:

> You should have an antivirus, with real-time protection running along with
> Windows Defender. I think you are fine--I don't believe these reports
> indicate any problem with the protection provided by either product.
>
> --
>
> "slybo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:A34CFA38-C01E-4A5C-B3CE-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I can not find anywhere if leaving Norton and Defender both running with
> >real
> > time protection and having this conflict will cause you to have a problem
> > with being protected, does anyone know? It does not seem to be causing me
> > any
> > problem and I do not get any pop ups, the only way I know it is going on
> > is
> > to look at the Norton Reports. So does allowing this conflict to go on
> > hurt
> > anything, until they have a fix.
> > --
> > slybo
> >
> >
> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the clarification--it has been a while since the details were
> >> posted, and I haven't seen it first hand.
> >>
> >> I don't know that this behavior has changed. There have been two
> >> revisions
> >> to the engine and none to the User Interface since the beta2 release, and
> >> I
> >> don't recall hearing after the second engine rev whether folks still see
> >> this issue.
> >>
> >> We anticipate that there will be a UI revision issued at some point, and
> >> that would be another time to test this interaction. However, I don't
> >> know
> >> if this is something Microsoft alone can solve.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> "joris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:80B1E6F9-2E7C-4002-A830-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > hi bill , not on every boot , but maybe 30 and more times a day.
> >> > "msmpeng" the real-time protection is constantly trying to get in the
> >> > files
> >> > of norton and is stopped also constantly by the "symantec resource
> >> > protector"
> >> > so the only solution to avoid this is turn one of the 2 off.
> >> > so i dit , the real-time protection from defender....
> >> >
> >> > but is there a solution for the conflict , and has the conflict other
> >> > problems ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You're misinterpreting. The OP has turned off a particular feature of
> >> >> some
> >> >> Norton versions that alarms if their files are touched in some way.
> >> >> Windows
> >> >> Defender causes this alarm to go off on every boot, apparently.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> "ANONYMOUS" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> >> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As I understand it, you have terminated Norton AV. Have you got any
> >> >> > other antivirus protection? Defender is not an anti-virus
> >> >> > protection
> >> >> > and you should be more concerned about viruses than spywares.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Have you tried free AVG/Grisoft for a temporary solution?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > mec wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is there some possibilities that, with one of the next updates, the
> >> >> >> "Symantec
> >> >> >> Resouce Protector" of Norton AV doesn't go to conflict with
> >> >> >> Defender
> >> >> >> anymore?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I would like really to be able to reactivate this Norton AV
> >> >> >> function
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> security!
> >> >> >> Thanks for an answer.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>