PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

AMD or Intel for music production?

 
 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
 
      4th Apr 2011
Hi

This is my first post so apologies for wrong terminology etc…

I mainly use my PC as a DAW running Reaper but it’s just not cutting the mustard. There are various issues which I am putting down to the inability to process samples quickly/efficiently enough.

So, I’ve decided to upgrade. Problem is – not much cash! My budget is around £300-£400 and I’m happy to build myself.

I’m looking at processors and see that AMD’s are much cheaper. Scouring the web has given me a bunch of conflicting responses over the best way to go.

Can anyone offer advice on this – AMD or Intel, and the relative performances for Athlons/Semprons/core i5s… and so on for my needs?

Sorry of this is all vague!


Current Spec:
Intel Core 2 E4500 2.2GHz CPU
2GB RAM
GA-T671MG Motherboard
GeForce 8300GS 128MB DDR2 Graphics
Seagate Barracuda 7200-10 HDD
Alesis iO|14 FireWire Sound
115W PSU

Last edited by muckshifter; 4th Apr 2011 at 09:43 PM.. Reason: link removed
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ian Ian is offline
Rocket Scientist
Ian's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 16,071
 
      5th Apr 2011
Welcome to the forums dajojojo

Are you using Windows 7? If so, have you loaded up the "resource monitor" to see where your bottleneck is? That may be helpful in deciding where to splash the cash in terms of hardware. It could be that the software is heavily dependant on the CPU, RAM or HDD - so if we can identify which ones that would be good. I'd hate to recommend a fast CPU only to find out that it's drive access times or memory swap that caused the lag.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Master of Logic
Silverhazesurfer's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 953
 
      5th Apr 2011
I just recently installed a 75GB Intel SSD in a machine. Dual Core 3.06 Intel, 2GB DDR2 800. Windows 7.

The thing was so fast while browsing that it appeared to load folder contents before the second click was finished.

Upgrading your HD to something super fast will help with bottle necks for sure. Downside, price.

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...&cat=5300&mnf=

 
-Surfer

I'm not a rocket surgeon, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Last edited by Silverhazesurfer; 5th Apr 2011 at 01:45 PM.. Reason: stupid link.
 
Reply With Quote
 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
 
      6th Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Welcome to the forums dajojojo

Are you using Windows 7? If so, have you loaded up the "resource monitor" to see where your bottleneck is? That may be helpful in deciding where to splash the cash in terms of hardware. It could be that the software is heavily dependant on the CPU, RAM or HDD - so if we can identify which ones that would be good. I'd hate to recommend a fast CPU only to find out that it's drive access times or memory swap that caused the lag.
I'm using XP (my PC came with Vista but there wasn't enough hardware support for the midi/audio devices).

I tried a few things last night and kept an eye on the XP resource monitor, and Reaper's own CPU performance monitor. If I'm replaying a multitrack recording with a handful of VST effects and software samplers the CPU intermitently maxes out and sometimes the program hangs. If I'm recording multitracks I get dropouts when RAM usage and CPU load are ok - the HDD sounds like it's struggling so I'm guessing it can't write fast enough. RAM seems to be stable.

So my (probably shoddy) test seems to indacate to me that the DSP processing is too much for the CPU and the write demand to disc is too much for the HDD/SATA interface.

On this basis I'm definitely going to build a new base unit - still not sure which procesor to go for though...
 
Reply With Quote
 
V_R V_R is offline
@ 4.2Ghz
V_R's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 8,857
 
      6th Apr 2011
Rather than 'AMD or Intel' i'd say go for one that is within your budget or best for your needs.

Regarding AMD vs Intel, a very general explanation would be....

AMD - Best bang for your buck
Intel - Slightly better performance increase.

 


Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | Intel i7 @ 4.2Ghz under a Noctua NH-U12P | 6GB Corsair XMS DDR3
Asus GTX580 | Creative X-FI Titanium HD | Crucial M225 128GB SSD + 3TB's of Storage
Corsair HX850 | Logitech G19 & G25 | Razer Deathadder Respawn | Wireless Xbox 360 Pad
Samsung 2443BW | Lian Li PC-7FW | Acoustic Energy Aego M | Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
 
Reply With Quote
 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
 
      7th Apr 2011
for what you actually need there would be no real difference between AMD or Intel so I would just go for whatever you can afford. I would say if going AMD at least get a Phenom II x4 or for intel at least get a minimum of either an i5 750 or an i5 2500(better to get this over i5 750).
 
Reply With Quote
 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
 
      9th Apr 2011
Thanks for all of your really helpful replies!

Base on these and my budget I've decided to go for:

Coolermaster Sileo 500 Silent Midi Tower Case - Black £ 58.99
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 2.80GHz (Socket AM3) £ 130.79
Asus M4A87TD/USB3 AMD 870 (Socket AM3) DDR3 PCI-Express MOBO £70.79
Noctua NH-U9B-SE2 CPU Cooler £ 41.99
530W Be Quiet! Pure Power BQT L7 ATX2.3 Power Supply £ 44.99
4GB (1x4GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 1333MHz S/C Module £ 31.99
500GB WD Caviar Blue SATA 6Gb/s 16MB Cache £ 26.64
Total: £406.18

unless you can see any glaring errors!

Cheers, dajojojo
 
Reply With Quote
 
sugar 'n spikes
floppybootstomp's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greenwich
Posts: 16,347
 
      9th Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by dajojojo View Post
Thanks for all of your really helpful replies!

Base on these and my budget I've decided to go for:

Coolermaster Sileo 500 Silent Midi Tower Case - Black £ 58.99
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 2.80GHz (Socket AM3) £ 130.79
Asus M4A87TD/USB3 AMD 870 (Socket AM3) DDR3 PCI-Express MOBO £70.79
Noctua NH-U9B-SE2 CPU Cooler £ 41.99
530W Be Quiet! Pure Power BQT L7 ATX2.3 Power Supply £ 44.99
4GB (1x4GB) DDR3 PC3-10666C9 1333MHz S/C Module £ 31.99
500GB WD Caviar Blue SATA 6Gb/s 16MB Cache £ 26.64
Total: £406.18

unless you can see any glaring errors!

Cheers, dajojojo
No errors I can see, very good choice imo

 
Don Van Vliet 1941 - 2010. And the acid gold bar swirled up and down, up and down.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Internet Junkie
Me__2001's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 4,351
 
      9th Apr 2011
Just to throw a spanner in the works

I'd go with the X4 965 with a 3.4Ghz clock, slightly cheaper and it'll probably perform better with the higher clock speed

 
I'm out of bed and dressed, what more do you want?

I always take life with a grain of salt, ... a slice of lemon, ...and a shot of tequila

I used to have an open mind but my brains kept falling out

One more step to enlightenment ... but which way ?



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI shifting away from Intel chipset production bbbl67 Processors 7 27th Aug 2006 08:26 AM
Intel restarts production of entry-level chipsets YKhan Processors 2 11th Nov 2005 07:57 PM
CFP: SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS. Special Issue: Operational Control of Wafer Production. Production Planning & Control International Journal Rub?n Ruiz Processors 0 24th Jan 2005 03:34 PM
digital music production Eric Windows XP Music 0 16th Mar 2004 05:35 PM
** WHAT fast graphis cards support `DUEL HEAD` so i can use 2 monitors for music production and video editing, etc ? [see inside]...TIA PBS ATI Video Cards 1 10th Aug 2003 06:12 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM.