3DMARK2006 => 1700
OC 750/1600 => 2478
CrystalMark 2004R3 and PCMark Vantage scores have big difference.
The main reason is these 3 models HD 4200 default clock are different.
The other benchmark scores are similar.
We can treat the small drop as allowable error.
Built-in VGA HD 4200 performance, because DFI default clock is 700MHz, it causes 3D performance is higher.
But the DRAM BIOS is only 1333.
GIGABYTE has VGA DRAM option to 1600.
It also enhance the 3D performance.
BIOSTAR can OC core to 820MHz. Its the highest one in these 3 models.
Even though, I think they all use same 785G chipset and also some drop in different chipset lot.
So you can treat they are same level in performance.
Using DFI LANPARTY BI 785G-M35 to test power consumption
AMD Phenom II X2 545 3000Mhz
System Standby - 73W
CPU Full Speed - 102W
AMD Phenom II X4 B45 3750Mhz
System Standby - 75W
CPU Full Speed - 153W
AMD platform power consumption in X2 and X4 are same as standby condition.
After enable X4 CPU and pull clock to 3.75GHz full speed, it is 51W more than X2.
Using quad core CPU will be more power consumption.
However, its still acceptable.
The CPU OC ability is almost same for these 3 models.
BIOS options are very rich to let users can tune up the performance.
Besides enable X4, they all provide enable X3 option.
It makes X2 CPU tunes up easily.
These three 785G has their own advantages.
GIAGBYTE has full features, DFI has better heat design and BIOSTAR non-solid capacitor design makes it be cheaper.
Also they all have different lack points, so I think its unfair to pick up any one be the best choice.
For choosing AMD CPU, I think the best C/P is Athlon II X4 620.
X4 620 can enable L3 cache to increase the performance.
Athlon II X3 425 is cheaper and also has L3 cache. However, if you are unlucky,
the 4th core cannot be enabled, 425 L3 performance is lower than 620 with quad core.
Not all Athlon II X2/X3/X4 CPU can guarantee to be able to enable L3 or X4.
So when you buy AMD CPU, I suggest you can choose X4 620.
Of course there are more brands in the market for you to choose.
This article bases on my personal configuration to make the OC and Performance reference guide.
You can choose your own best one by budget, requirement and brands.
The test above is just for the users who have same budget or requirement as me to refer.
Finally, wish all of you can build up your highest C/P and best matched quad core PC in 2010.
Windwithme wish you all the best in 2010. Thanks.
This is my latest toy.
12/17 2009, Sony launched the very popular game FF13 and PS3 combo limited edition.
Recalling my memory, I havent been playing game for long time.
My PS2 is under dust over 4 years.
Only this AMD OC guide takes me 4 weeks to face some unstable and tuning performance.
I always reinstall OS, fine tune BIOS and repeat run the benchmark software.
This article really takes time to get it done.
I wish I could have time to play games in 2010. I think it should be good for leisure time.