So what do you want? Microsoft has a clearly defined set of standards and a
process for resolution of disputes about how those standards are applied.
Anybody who is familiar with the operation of DNSBL's know that there is
potential for abuse in a product which offers to "remove" something that may
be viewed as legitimate by some and not by others.
The early players in this area are starting to get smart and re-form
themselves as legitimate businesses. Microsoft will apply objective
standards to them--they can't look back in history and say "but three years
ago you were doing......" This is going to make many people who've been
fighting against this stuff for any length of time upset, but in the end, if
it stops the drive-by installs and the programs with no uninstall, etc,
it'll surely be a good thing, right? I've already seen a couple of posts of
"help, I have xyz spyware on my system and this program can't remove it"
whose answer was "check out add/remove programs."
Take a good look at the criteria for inclusion and see whether you think
Weatherbug violates them.
"Yardwaste" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:14e501c4f766$619becb0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Well it started off well. I actually like how the MS
> program worked. It even a found a few that Spybot and
> adaware missed.
> But now you caved in because a spyware site/programe owners
> complained to you and you are going to remove it from your
> list of targets. Read it and weep spyware haters
> http://netrn.net/spywareblog/archive...-vs-microsoft/
>
> Other adware/spyware programs indentify weatherbug as
> adware because it is!!
>
> Come on MS. How many other spyware companies that complain
> and cry the blues to you will you remove???? And you are
> going to want me to pay. How can I trust your program
> anymore?? I guess when fastclick, and xxxtoolbar ect cry to
> you or pay you, you remove them from your target list too!!????