On a sunny day (Sat, 22 May 2004 07:28:16 GMT) it happened ByteEnable
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed)>:
>In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
>method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
>primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
>advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
>sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.
>
>http://www.linuxelectrons.com/articl...40521120908833
It seems #5,506,981 is not completely 'of target'.
Bad, these kinds of claims, perhaps prior art can be proven.
PLL is a normal electronics method, synthesizer, same,
start-stop method was already in use in the sixties.
Maybe I should patent the .... for later.
JP