PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

All Computers suing Intel...Bogus

 
 
ByteEnable
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd May 2004
In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.

http://www.linuxelectrons.com/articl...40521120908833
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd May 2004
On a sunny day (Sat, 22 May 2004 07:28:16 GMT) it happened ByteEnable
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed)>:

>In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
>method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
>primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
>advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
>sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.
>
>http://www.linuxelectrons.com/articl...40521120908833

It seems #5,506,981 is not completely 'of target'.
Bad, these kinds of claims, perhaps prior art can be proven.
PLL is a normal electronics method, synthesizer, same,
start-stop method was already in use in the sixties.
Maybe I should patent the .... for later.
JP
 
Reply With Quote
 
KR Williams
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th May 2004
In article <c8npbq$h3b$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
> On a sunny day (Sat, 22 May 2004 07:28:16 GMT) it happened ByteEnable
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> <(E-Mail Removed)>:
>
> >In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
> >method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
> >primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
> >advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
> >sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.
> >
> >http://www.linuxelectrons.com/articl...40521120908833

> It seems #5,506,981 is not completely 'of target'.
> Bad, these kinds of claims, perhaps prior art can be proven.
> PLL is a normal electronics method, synthesizer, same,
> start-stop method was already in use in the sixties.
> Maybe I should patent the .... for later.


As usual, Jan is drunk.

--
Keith
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel to develop new CPU architecture for OLPC type computers lyon_wonder Processors 1 16th Oct 2007 06:21 AM
HP Suing G&G Ninestar Image Co - August 31, 2006 BobbytheBrain Printers 13 15th Sep 2006 02:40 AM
Re: Suing Dell --Any Consumer Rights? sbb78247 DIY PC 0 4th Feb 2006 03:28 AM
How do I prevent bogus entries by computers to my guest book form? =?Utf-8?B?SlN1bGxpdmFuNDQ=?= Microsoft Frontpage 2 3rd Jan 2006 01:42 AM
All in Wonder crashes on computers with Intel CPUs w/Hyper Threading Steve ATI Video Cards 4 13th Apr 2004 11:25 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 AM.