On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:52:33 -0800, "acdcnews"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Hi, everybody:
>
>I do 2-D design work on an XP box and am considering some upgrades to help
>with video refresh rates and to stop the occassional "bogging down" that my
>system is starting to have ( 3 yr old machine: P4 1.7 GHz, 512 MB SDRAM,
>nVIDIA 64 Mb).
>
>My files are sometimes in excess of 100 MB, and many times are
>high-resolution, multi-layered Photoshop CS files (this is where the bogging
>down is starting to show). Things have slowed down many times in Corel Draw
>12 as well, especially on particularly complex vector/line-based
>illustrations.
>
>Should I worry about upgrading my video card, or should I concentrate my
>funds for more RAM, or do I need both in order to improve performance in
>design tasks?
>
>Thanks much!
>
>Ava
>www.acdcgraphics.com
>
The video card is not going to make much if any difference.
Your use will benefit from faster CPU, faster memory
(PC100/133 just isn't all that fast relatively speaking),
and possibly more memory. Check XP's Task Manager for the
"Commit Charge", "Peak" memory utilization and you'll have a
better idea of how much memory you're using.
For your uses, you really do need the CPU, faster memory (so
of course motherboard change too). Adding more slow memory
will be a complete waste of $ _IF_ Task Manager doesn't show
you're already exceeding 512MB as a peak.